I do think that people's perceptions of Kanter are skewed by hope and optimism. Everyone seems to compare the player Kanter could potentially become against the player AL is today. Al is not a good pick and role defender. Kanter is just flat out not a good defender. Did you watch the games he was in last year? He couldn't miss his rotations because he was so far out of position he wasn't there to miss them. He has a lot to learn before I am ready to throw him in the starting lineup to replace AL. Kanter is slow reading the system, misses assignments, and just flat out does not know where to be half the time. That does not mean that is the player he is always going to be, but until he shows he has the IQ to play defense I'm not ready to kick AL away for nothing.
Now, just because he is on the floor does not mean that we need to run every prime time play his way. I think AL is a great 2nd / 3rd option. If Favors could develop into a legit first option and Milsap were content to come off the bech then we would have a heck of a team.
You must really hate Millsap for missing a layup at the buzzer that would have won the game. Twice.All you have to do is watch the games. You can WITNESS it for yourself. Al isn't clutch. I have seen him miss big shots plenty of times.
You must really hate Millsap for missing a layup at the buzzer that would have won the game. Twice.
Oh, wait, it's okay, 'Nerd puts those games in the "winnable losses" category, they are Al's fault.
Did I say he hadn't? I'm disagreeing with the notion that Al isn't clutch, based on the "I've watched him" test.you don't think al has done that?
Did I say he hadn't?
You mean game-winning shots?the fact that paul has missed 45% of hit shots in those situations doesn't make it any better that al has missed 65% of his shots in those situations.
Did I say he hadn't? I'm disagreeing with the notion that Al isn't clutch, based on the "I've watched him" test.