What's new

Lance ArmDrugStrong going to burn?

patently false

Armstrong never failed a drug test so until he admited that he was juicing it was all rumor and unsubstantiated. So why draw the line with going after just one guy with no proof? Seems pretty hypocriticla to me.
 
I guess I'm in the minority but I don't give a **** if he juiced. The dude overcame cancer and then won the tour de france several times in a row. What was it, like 7 times or something?

You mean if I stick a needle in my *** I can win the tour de france? No? Of course not.

Today's steroids were last century's vitamins and exercise equipment and machines. Science has been trying to enhance physical performance for centuries. Why it's suddenly considered taboo is beyond me.

The dude overcame cancer, and then won the tour de france, like 7 times. We're seriously condemning him for juicing up? Even though everyone else was juicing up too? Why?

Let me see anyone on this board, or reporting on this story in the media, win the tour de france even once. Juice up all you want and tell me how it instantly made you superman, lol.

agree.
Besides, WGAS, really?


Not quite so sure about McGuire & Sosa though. Not sure how I feel about the steroids in baseball and the records they set while doping.
But I do think Pete Rose belongs in the Hall of Fame. I know it's not really related, but still.
 
Cheating might be somewhat forgiveable.The lying and suing & trying to destroy people who were telling the truth makes him a huge a-hole.
 
I think their actions damages the reputation of their sport. However I think any involvement by government thru court cases, hearings...is idiotic.
 
The problem with the "just let every one do it" position is that apparently not everyone gets an equal boost from PEDs. While there have been no scientific studies done, the anecdotal evidence strongly suggests people react differently when a PED is introduced into their system. Some people get a huge boost, some get a negligible boost. In a recent Sports Illustrated Article, one US Cyclist who claims he was pressured to use EPO by Armstrong said he didn't get any benefit from them at all.

So while Armstrong is clearly a world class cyclist, he may not be the best one - just the one whose body reacts the best to drugs.
 
The problem with the "just let every one do it" position is that apparently not everyone gets an equal boost from PEDs. While there have been no scientific studies done, the anecdotal evidence strongly suggests people react differently when a PED is introduced into their system. Some people get a huge boost, some get a negligible boost. In a recent Sports Illustrated Article, one US Cyclist who claims he was pressured to use EPO by Armstrong said he didn't get any benefit from them at all.

So while Armstrong is clearly a world class cyclist, he may not be the best one - just the one whose body reacts the best to drugs.

The same can be said of actual physical training. Some guys get ripped really quick or are naturally ripped without even working out, others have to work their *** off to get there.
 
I guess I'm in the minority but I don't give a **** if he juiced. The dude overcame cancer and then won the tour de france several times in a row. What was it, like 7 times or something?

You mean if I stick a needle in my *** I can win the tour de france? No? Of course not.

Today's steroids were last century's vitamins and exercise equipment and machines. Science has been trying to enhance physical performance for centuries. Why it's suddenly considered taboo is beyond me.

The dude overcame cancer, and then won the tour de france, like 7 times. We're seriously condemning him for juicing up? Even though everyone else was juicing up too? Why?

Let me see anyone on this board, or reporting on this story in the media, win the tour de france even once. Juice up all you want and tell me how it instantly made you superman, lol.

Shocker here. Sorry but it's not the fact that he juiced. It's the fact that he juiced, adamantly denied it for years in his all high and mighty, I beat cancer, why would I ever put drugs in my body, sort of way, and then comes clean like every other POS when the **** hits the fan and their backs are up against the wall. He may have helped thousands of people with cancer. Good for him. This doesn't change the fact that he's a major doucher of epic proportions and is a pretty ****ty human being from almost all accounts.
 
Haven't read the thread, but I thought I'd drop in to declare what a giant douchehole Lance has made himself into. Every non-naive person already knew everybody was juicing, so this record of denial avalanching back onto him is just sorta funny. He should have handled this in an ENTIRELY different fashion.

Whatevar dude.
 
Meh. If you know the sport, they almost all are.
I don't know the sport, but your statement does not conflict with my statement. Also, there likely were many hundreds or thousands of people who would liked to have made a living in the sport but they did not want to cheat, or they did not have the money or access for the right doctors to help them cheat.
 
I guess I'm in the minority but I don't give a **** if he juiced. The dude overcame cancer and then won the tour de france several times in a row. What was it, like 7 times or something?

You mean if I stick a needle in my *** I can win the tour de france? No? Of course not.

Today's steroids were last century's vitamins and exercise equipment and machines. Science has been trying to enhance physical performance for centuries. Why it's suddenly considered taboo is beyond me.

The dude overcame cancer, and then won the tour de france, like 7 times. We're seriously condemning him for juicing up? Even though everyone else was juicing up too? Why?

Let me see anyone on this board, or reporting on this story in the media, win the tour de france even once. Juice up all you want and tell me how it instantly made you superman, lol.

It's a big deal because PED use is against the rules of the sport. Vitamins and exercise equipment are not. He cheated, which gave him an unfair advantage against everyone who didn't cheat. (Yes, lots of cyclists cheat, but to say that ALL cheat is unsubstantiated and almost certainly wrong.)

Then he lied about his PED use for years, and bullied and tormented mercilessly those who accused him of cheating. Frankly, I'm less bothered by his cheating than the despicable way in which he bullied and tried to silence his accusers. He's a scumbag who doesn't deserve our compassion or forgiveness, unless and until he apologizes and tries makes amends to all of the people whose lives he tried to ruin.
 
I wonder whether Lance influenced an increase in cheating in the sport.

The US Postal Service is trying to get back some of the $30,000,000 they spent promoting Lance.
 
I wonder whether Lance influenced an increase in cheating in the sport.

The US Postal Service is trying to get back some of the $30,000,000 they spent promoting Lance.

And this is why it doesn't bother me that he lied about it. Once he came clean, everyone demanded a refund. So how much of that 500 million that he raised for charity would not have happened if he wouldn't have lied?
 
Did they cure cancer by the way? No.
Could they have instead used all that charity money instead to reduce cancer causing chemicals in our environment, and thereby reduce cancer cases worldwide? Yes.
 
Top