InGameStrategy
Well-Known Member
Um, the move to bring him back for one year was financial. Utah didn't want to pay any more than they had to because if they had successfully made the trade for AK and had Fes on the roster for the QO, they would be able to get close to the LT limit.Given Fes's poor work ethic and the possibility of Tomic next year, 1 year was the correct move.
Who cares about work ethic if a player is the best option anyway (which he was last year at backup C when it counted); there's no ring for "playing hard." It's about ability, and while Fes would be better right now if he had been more disciplined, he was often the best backup C available at current skill level anyway, and he has had very little development minutes over the three past years. You don't develop in an average of (633 / (82 * 3) =) 3 to 4 minutes per available game.
Not sure why you don't understand that; the past two games plus the playoffs only show that Fes's impact--albeit not polished--was obvious at existing levels, and he's barely tapped his upside. He won't likely be an 18/7 player anytime soon, but the evidence was there.
Last edited: