What's new

Who would take Shane Larkin at #14?

Would you take Shane Larkin at #14?

  • Yes

    Votes: 9 18.0%
  • No

    Votes: 41 82.0%

  • Total voters
    50
GREAT poll.. reenergizes my faith in jazzfanz.

Thanks.

where did you even get that faith? Have you looked at what was said about pasts drafts? Wasnt honz one of the only ones hyping Hayward and everyone else was saying the opposite? Why would you expect the Majority of Jazzfanz to get it right? Wasnt Evan Turner voted number one overall on this board back in 2010?

hell, Im willing to be that if you go against the grain here, then you will probably be more right than wrong.


Trey Burke #1 overall? really? c'mon... give me a break. lol

Too bad you already voted 'Yes', so I can't help you...
 
Thanks.



Too bad you already voted 'Yes', so I can't help you...

Ouch. WTF, Hack. You dummy.


I didnt want any help. I got this.


Its like having that friend who is bad gambler. You take the bets against him and just take his money, or like housing 21. Free money.

I just take the opposite of what the majority here thinks and I come out ahead. I dont even have to scout the players.
 
I didnt want any help. I got this.


Its like having that friend who is bad gambler. You take the bets against him and just take his money, or like housing 21. Free money.

I just take the opposite of what the majority here thinks and I come out ahead. I dont even have to scout the players.

Fair enough. Hack.
 
Larkin is at worst an excellent back up. How many players picked at 14 are more than this? I take Larking @ 14 all day! I'm cooling on the German Steve Nash quite a bit. Dude is way too skinny and other that hoops summit what has he done? I see major bust potential. I'll admit I bought into it for a while. But I'm over it. Give me Larkin!
 
LOL!

In any other draft Larkin is a late 1st rounder/2nd round pick.

Drafting Larkin at 14 makes the kings drafting of the Jimmer in the lottery look good.
 
Back
Top