What's new

ESPN Article that includes Favors

Should we Extend Favors or wait and see?

  • Extend

    Votes: 14 56.0%
  • Wait and See

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • Extend, but only if the deal is less than 11 million a year.

    Votes: 11 44.0%

  • Total voters
    25

Batman

Well-Known Member
5. Extend or wait and see: Derrick Favors.
Ham: Extend. It makes absolutely no sense that Favors played only 23 minutes per game last season for coach Tyrone Corbin. And now, entering his fourth year in the league, the Utah Jazz are finally going to hand the keys over to the former No. 3 overall selection without truly knowing how good he can be. Like Monroe, teams will line up to throw money at Favors next summer. With Al Jefferson and Paul Millsap leaving via free agency, the Jazz have very little choice but to pay up.

Katz: Extend. With Jefferson no longer draining possessions with his slowly developing low-post moves, the Jazz finally have a legitimate opportunity to feature Favors in the offense. Add in the fact that Favors has shown promise defensively and on the boards and this seems like a good time to capitalize on the 22-year-old's value.

Sunnergren: Extend. Favors is a solid, competent professional basketball player. When his minutes -- and, proportionally, counting stats -- increase this season, he may begin to view himself as something more. It's probably best to extend him before he gets this idea in his head, especially if he turns out to be right.

Tynan: Wait and see. Despite physical specimen status, Favors has left something to be desired. He averaged a career high 23.2 minutes per game last season, but his inconsistent numbers belied his defensive flashes and rebounding potential. He's still a project offensively, so it'd be wise to give him starter's minutes first to see what he's got. Utah has time, after all.

Wallace: Extend. Let's be honest here: You're the Utah Jazz. You're located in pristine and picturesque Salt Lake City. But name the last marquee, franchise-altering free agent to go there and set up shop? Favors could be an All-Star, now that he stands to be in a featured role. Locking him up now is a bit of risk, but it's much less of a gamble than pushing him one step closer to free agency.



What do you guys think? Discuss
 
Wallace: Extend. Let's be honest here: You're the Utah Jazz. You're located in pristine and picturesque Salt Lake City. But name the last marquee, franchise-altering free agent to go there and set up shop? Favors could be an All-Star, now that he stands to be in a featured role. Locking him up now is a bit of risk, but it's much less of a gamble than pushing him one step closer to free agency.

Wow seriously? Not cool. Ok everyone twitter bomb Mr. Wallace. https://twitter.com/WallaceNBA_ESPN. @WallaceNBA_ESPN
 
Mr.Wallace is 100% right. Utah has to take that risk, because we are Utah. We aren't LA. We have to go all in with the hand we got.
 
Funny that Sanders was the only unanimous "extend" out of Cousins, Favors, Monroe and Evans (well that's not surprising).
 
Still say 12 million would be my mark for a Favors deal.

Still say at worse, with little to no improvement he is a 10 million dollar player as is.

At best he completely dominates defensively and shows good offensive improvement and is a max guy.

His agent will view the 12 million as a middle ground as to what will probably happen, he might push for 14, then both sides settle for 13. I'd still be OK with it.
 
Still say 12 million would be my mark for a Favors deal.

Still say at worse, with little to no improvement he is a 10 million dollar player as is.

At best he completely dominates defensively and shows good offensive improvement and is a max guy.

His agent will view the 12 million as a middle ground as to what will probably happen, he might push for 14, then both sides settle for 13. I'd still be OK with it.

I agree.... wish I could change my vote now
 
Cousins deal will play a part in what Favors gets. If Cousins is maxed Favor's agent's eyes are going to light up and is going to demand very close to it. If Cousins settles in for 13 million a year on average, should be able to get Derrick at 12 or a little under.
 
We should try to extend him for Millsap money at least. That's the guy he's replacing, and he's shown he's worth at least that much.
 
Cousins deal will play a part in what Favors gets. If Cousins is maxed Favor's agent's eyes are going to light up and is going to demand very close to it. If Cousins settles in for 13 million a year on average, should be able to get Derrick at 12 or a little under.

Really? I don't think they are comparable and should be used for contract negotiations.

One is a defensive minded player who struggles offensively, but isn't completely incompetent. A contract comp for Favors is what Larry Sanders gets, IMO. Also looking at contracts for DeAndre Jordan.

The other is a me-first offensive scorer who doesn't try to play defense at all. A contact comp for Cousins would be Al Jefferson (though you are going to pay extra for the youth)
 
Still say 12 million would be my mark for a Favors deal.

Still say at worse, with little to no improvement he is a 10 million dollar player as is.

At best he completely dominates defensively and shows good offensive improvement and is a max guy.

His agent will view the 12 million as a middle ground as to what will probably happen, he might push for 14, then both sides settle for 13. I'd still be OK with it.
Good post.
 
Back
Top