For real doe... It should probably be Randle

[Litany]

a lot of people projected him as a starter. He was consistently mocked in the top10. I'm not sure he is a "star", but he's a good #2 guy.



He'll be able to play there. He won't be a guy that you run a lot of plays for, but he should have a couple of spots he like to shoot 3s from, and plenty of garbage points. He's there for defense.

^same things were said about Kawhi

Hmm. I think im going to research Gordon more. If he can be a great 3 that is an elite defender and can fix hIs shot I think he could be a good pick. But 40% FT? That's Drummond esque.

Also, we don't exactly have the spurs coaching staff


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

 

[franklin]

Before the year he was right there with Wiggins and Parker. What did he do that was so disappointing? His team underachieved, but he didn't. He walks into the NBA as a double double guy, and he's at least Zach Randolph.

I really hate to say something that KKKKKKKKKKK would say. But he really does want to win more than anyone else, and I think that's important. It'd be great to see him yelling at Hayward and Kanter to actually try.

Basically, It would be easier to teach Randle to defend than to teach Gordon how to score.

#RandleAt5
#SorryCy

HTF you get seven pages on this ****? I want to poison you for this Randle ****.

 

[Bawse Dawg]

HTF you get seven pages on this ****? I want to poison you for this Randle ****.

I lost control of this thread long ago.

 

[[size/HUGE] fixed [/size]]

Hmm. I think im going to research Gordon more. If he can be a great 3 that is an elite defender and can fix hIs shot I think he could be a good pick. But 40% FT? That's Drummond esque.

Also, we don't exactly have the spurs coaching staff


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

I guarantee you Gordon will be able to play the 3. He'll do some minutes at the 4 because small-ball is effective at times. BUT KAWHI PLAYS SPOT MINUTES AT 4, TOO.

 

[b_line]

I would much rather have Vonleh or Gordon than Randle. Not sold on Smart yet, but I like him slightly more than Randle.

What really pisses me off though is that we basically could have drafted in the same 5-9 slots and kept Millsap. But we wouldn't have the GS picks though. So we have to see if Millsap plus pick 10 in this draft > 2014 Picks 5 and 23 + 2017 GS pick. That is basically what we traded for.

I read that the Cavs are leaning toward Embiid at number 1. If he does not go there, there is a slim chance he could fall to 5. Even slimmer Jabari could fall to us. Out of the top 4, Exum is our best hope.

Just say no to Randle though.

 

[b_line]

a lot of people projected him as a starter. He was consistently mocked in the top10. I'm not sure he is a "star", but he's a good #2 guy.



He'll be able to play there. He won't be a guy that you run a lot of plays for, but he should have a couple of spots he like to shoot 3s from, and plenty of garbage points. He's there for defense.

^same things were said about Kawhi

I don't understand how people think Kawhi is a good #2 option, but then people think Hayward is not even close to a #2 option.


Damn it. We just needed a top 4 pick. We have so many complementary players. Sucks.

 

[seattlejazzfan]

this.

****, braughs, did you watch any of the ATL-Indy series? We should all be missing the hell out of Millsap.

Millsap + 10th pick > Julius Randle. Any day of the ****ing week.

Lol. What did we see in the ATL/Indy series we should be missing? Was it the 39% FGs, the 33% 3pt, the 3 TOs per game? The disappearing act offensively in the last two games when his team needed just one win? He rebounded well in the series - I'll give him that, but he's proven to be a mediocre rebounder anyway. Basically, if you like early playoff exits or just missing the playoffs, Millsap is your guy.

Sent from my SGH-T959V using Tapatalk 2

 

[Litany]

I guarantee you Gordon will be able to play the 3. He'll do some minutes at the 4 because small-ball is effective at times. BUT KAWHI PLAYS SPOT MINUTES AT 4, TOO.

I'm warming to the idea of Gordon. Gotta see how workouts go.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

 

[Deleted member 848]

Lol. What did we see in the ATL/Indy series we should be missing? Was it the 39% FGs, the 33% 3pt, the 3 TOs per game? The disappearing act offensively in the last two games when his team needed just one win? He rebounded well in the series - I'll give him that, but he's proven to be a mediocre rebounder anyway. Basically, if you like early playoff exits or just missing the playoffs, Millsap is your guy.

Sent from my SGH-T959V using Tapatalk 2

Seeing as Millsap is probably Randle's best case scenario, this is quite telling as to whether we should draft Randle or not.

 

[seattlejazzfan]

Seeing as Millsap is probably Randle's best case scenario, this is quite telling as to whether we should draft Randle or not.

I agree. If Millsap is Randle's best case, they should not draft Randle at 5.

Sent from my SGH-T959V using Tapatalk 2

 

[Sneakers]

I just don't see the Millsap Randle comparison at all

 

[[size/HUGE] fixed [/size]]

Lol. What did we see in the ATL/Indy series we should be missing? Was it the 39% FGs, the 33% 3pt, the 3 TOs per game? The disappearing act offensively in the last two games when his team needed just one win? He rebounded well in the series - I'll give him that, but he's proven to be a mediocre rebounder anyway. Basically, if you like early playoff exits or just missing the playoffs, Millsap is your guy.

Sent from my SGH-T959V using Tapatalk 2

lol.
Millsap was bringing it. I don't know anybody who actually watched the series and disagrees.