NBA Finals: Spurs vs. Heat
- Thread starter Beantown
- Start date
spurs are all about a systemic excellence. they are the team of the decade. but they are not a dynasty.
they won championships in
1999
2003
2005
2007
2014
no back to back championships and last championship was 7 years. not a dynasty. if you call this spurs a dynasty then you would have to call 60's celtics and MJ's bulls something else.
but if this spurs win couple of more championships in next 4 years then yes, they are a dynasty.
top dynasties
1. 60's celtics
2. MJ's bulls
3. showtime lakers
4. 50's lakers
5. shaq/kobe lakers
dynasties must win back to back and must dominate the league for long stretches. dynasties defend their title. that's very important. because it's always tougher to defend your belt. i don't even consider bad boy pistons a dynasty. they went 3 straight championships and won 2. this Heat is also not a dynasty. they went to 4 championships in a row and won 2. and one of my favorite teams bird's celtics weren't a dynasty. like spurs they couldn't put together a back to back championships.
and this is not just my view point. many basketball historians feel the same way too. but never say never. they have a chance to be a dynasty. timmy looks like he has 2-3 years left in him. manu & parker aren't done. and they have young star in kawhi. they have chance to make this much more special than this.
1. 60's celtics
2. MJ's bulls
3. showtime lakers
4. 50's lakers
5. shaq/kobe lakers
dynasties must win back to back and must dominate the league for long stretches. dynasties defend their title. that's very important. because it's always tougher to defend your belt. i don't even consider bad boy pistons a dynasty. they went 3 straight championships and won 2. this Heat is also not a dynasty. they went to 4 championships in a row and won 2. and one of my favorite teams bird's celtics weren't a dynasty. like spurs they couldn't put together a back to back championships.
and this is not just my view point. many basketball historians feel the same way too. but never say never. they have a chance to be a dynasty. timmy looks like he has 2-3 years left in him. manu & parker aren't done. and they have young star in kawhi. they have chance to make this much more special than this.
D
Deleted member 365
Guest
LOL.
We wiffed on the Finals MVP.
Those 2 drafts were brutal. Taking haywuss over George and Burks over Kawhi. Could you imagine how devastating we would be right now with Kawhi at the 3 and George at the 2?
That's why i say, DL has a lot to prove. Historically, we're really an avg/below avg run organization.
I want to see DL either move up and obtain 1 of the big 2 or stick at 5 and then upgrade the 23rd pick.
We wiffed on the Finals MVP.
Those 2 drafts were brutal. Taking haywuss over George and Burks over Kawhi. Could you imagine how devastating we would be right now with Kawhi at the 3 and George at the 2?
That's why i say, DL has a lot to prove. Historically, we're really an avg/below avg run organization.
I want to see DL either move up and obtain 1 of the big 2 or stick at 5 and then upgrade the 23rd pick.
D
Deleted member 848
Guest
Honestly, ^^ those draft misses aren't nearly as bad as Kosta K00f instead of Ibaka and Batum.
corbin would've made kawhi look like a future journeyman defender with no offence doe
D
Deleted member 365
Guest
D
Deleted member 365
Guest
Lol.
Most of this board wanted George and Kawhi, not Hayward or Burks. It's not just hindsight. There are many on this board who weren't blinded by Jerry's ideology or KOC's stubbornness.
To be fair, he looked really good in college. Could score, was tall, had 3pt range, rebounded well. Looked like the 2nd coming of Okur. Just sucked *** in the NBA because he had 0 confidence and never learned how to deal with NBA athleticism and size.
Why do you always have to list everything? Your schtick with the sizes is more than enough.
And why are your posts nothing but negative even though they mostly have LOL in them. Is it your way of sarcasm?