What's new
By:

Parsons sign offer sheet from the Mavs... 45/3

T

trailing

Member
With a player option on his last year, similar offer as to what Gordon got except Gordon got an extra year. The reason he only signed three years is because that is when Dirks contract runs out.

Will Houston match? this means Houstons cap hold is 15 million now and is for the next three days until they make up their mind. If they can get Bosh I think they should let Parsons go.

Dirk/Monta/Parsons/Chandler is a nice core, I think they can challenge for home court advantage in the west and may have an outside chance for another WCF.

Any opinions on the contract? seeing as how Batum and Parson got paid paying Gordon 60/4 is not the end of the world.
 
Yeah it depends on whether or not they get a bigger fish in the meantime. And yes, a Parsons, Monta, Dirk combo would be fun to watch.
 
trailing said:
Sorry for posting wrong but it says This is general nba, or am I missing something.?
Click to expand...
A+ posting. I was applauding your efforts, and felt bad that few would respond to your thread because it's in a relatively unpopular forum.
 
Rockets decline.

https://basketball.realgm.com/wiretap/234266/Rockets-Decline-To-Match-Chandler-Parsons-$46M-Offer-Sheet-With-Mavs
 
freakazoid said:
Rockets decline.

https://basketball.realgm.com/wiretap/234266/Rockets-Decline-To-Match-Chandler-Parsons-$46M-Offer-Sheet-With-Mavs
Click to expand...

I don't understand that.

That's a bad no match. It's only 3 years and he's a really good player. It's a little bit of an over pay, but still not a terrible contract.

Kinda wish'n the Jazz made that offer.
 
Hack said:
I don't understand that.

That's a bad no match. It's only 3 years and he's a really good player. It's a little bit of an over pay, but still not a terrible contract.

Kinda wish'n the Jazz made that offer.
Click to expand...

Ya, seems weird not to match.


£¥£
 
Didn't take long for Parsons to get his bitch on:

Parsons told Yahoo! Sports that it bothered him that Houston, which declined its right to match the Dallas Mavericks' offer and allowed Parsons to go to the Rockets' Interstate 45 rivals, made it clear the franchise didn't consider Parsons good enough to be the third-best player on a championship contender.

"Honestly, I was offended by the whole process," Parsons told Yahoo! Sports on Monday. "They publicly said that they were going out looking for a third star when I thought they had one right in front of them. I guess that's just how they viewed me as a player. I don't think I've scratched the surface of where I can be as a player and I think I'm ready for that role."
Click to expand...

As much as people wanted him on the Jazz, he seems like a big attitude that doesn't quite match his abilities.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Share this page
Back
Top