I’m not saying it’s not a cool record, I just don’t think it definitively means he’s going to be good, and it seems that’s how some people are using it.
I’m so tired of hearing how Collier broke Stockton’s rookie record as if it’s supposed to mean something. It is purely a volume/opportunity record. It’s not nothing, because Collier is a skilled passer, but it really doesn’t mean all that much either.
You quoted this in a format that’s difficult to respond to point by point on a cell phone, but I’ll try.
Kevin Durant was statistically a poor shooter his rookie season. We had also seen that he was a world class shooter in college. Slightly different than saying Collier’s FT stats don’t...
You’re taking a broad view and unsuccessfully trying to narrow it down.
Does winning or losing summer league games matter in the grand scheme? Of course not. Does players being competitive and trying to win summer league games matter when it’s your young and upcoming prospects? Of course. It...
I’d argue that for the last few games, Harkless has ran the offense better. Collier is flashier, and can make incredible passes, but he’s still quite inconsistent, has been playing dumb, and cannot score to save his life.
Hey now. While I wasn’t a super active poster, I had a few posts on how a person could easily tell just by the eye test that he was a skilled offensive player and would be a good shooter. Seemed like everybody just saw the low percentages and thought he was a bum.
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.