Hey now. While I wasn’t a super active poster, I had a few posts on how a person could easily tell just by the eye test that he was a skilled offensive player and would be a good shooter. Seemed like everybody just saw the low percentages and thought he was a bum.
Even if he did I’m not sure you’re right.
Walt is the better defender. The better floor general. He runs the offense better. Collier probably has better vision, and is a better passer, but I’m not sold he’s a smart player. With that being said, Collier is younger and has room/time to grow...
Clayton tests as a more than fine athlete, but this is really where functional athleticism comes to play for me. He never seems like he’s a bad athlete on the court, and ultimately, that’s all that matters.
I don’t know if this really classifies as an overreaction or not because he was drafted a lot higher, but I’m very positive Cody Williams has a lot better NBA career than Collier.
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.