Its just weird because I never ever see child porn or pedophiles or anything like that, yet certain people seem to always know where that kind of stuff is to be found.
The Venn diagram of the perpetrators has very little overlap, the behaviors involved are completely different (open hostility vs. secrecy, etc.), the end goal of the behavior is different (domination vs. illicit gratification). It's as if you have no understanding, at all, of the factors that drive these people.
I don't have to divide Europe and Canada, the Atlantic Ocean does that for me.
I actually acknowledged the behavior and that it was an issue. You responded with a lie, because you can't deal with the truth.
I spent a long time in this forum as one of the least popular posters. You're not even close to what motivates me.
www.nsopw.gov
exactly. You always know.Home | Dru Sjodin National Sex Offender Public Website
Search sex offender registries for all 50 states, the District of Columbia, U.S. Territories, and Indian Country.
When you want to know how to grow a tomato, ask a farmer/gardener. When you want to know how to change your spark plugs ask an auto mechanic. When you want to know how to build a deck ask a carpenter.
One thing I find somewhat ironic is that, on the one hand, you lash out at anyone mentioning QAnon, the conspiracy targeting elite Democrats as child molestors, you claimed QAnon “doesn’t interest anyone”, yet here you are focused on elites(in this case scientists and educators) molesting children, just as QAnon’s conspiracism thinking mode focuses on Democratic elites molesting children. QAnon paints with a broad brush, regarding child molestation, and you seem to be doing so as well. It’s like fishionjazz pointed out: you always know where to look, or you are at least willing to look and find it, if it suits your narrative. And, in this case, your anti-intellectual and anti-liberal educator bias zeros right in on sexual deviancy among scientists and educators, just as QAnon zeros in on sexual deviancy among certain political elites. Maybe you’re projecting when you lash out at the subject of QAnon? Just a thought.
That was quite a leap you took there to once again bring up your passion. I do find it humorous that you think educators are considered "elites". As for QAnon being about teachers molesting kids in their care, I'll take your word for it. I thought it was about someone secret inside the government claiming there was a plan to bring Trump back into power but will admit that I only learn about it second hand from people like you and The Thriller who worship Q.
Some masterful trollery here. Not only presenting a red herring, but wrapping it in a straw man as well. Accuse your opponent of making the statement that you, in fact, made to begin with. Impressive mental gymnastics there. Of course we all know you do not discuss any of this with even a modicum of intellectual honesty, as trolls are wont to do.
Which part was a red herring and straw man? That Red yet again brought up QAnon? That Red considered educators to be elites?
Keep going. You can triple down on this if you play your cards right.
You can justify so much when hatred is behind it. When the opposition is engaged in Slander and Treason, and is Godless and Guilty, why should you limited to telling the truth, or advise compromise to create a functioning government?Tucker Carlson: ‘Hatred’ of liberals ‘clouded my judgment’ before midterms
Fox News host Tucker Carlson said in an interview released Monday that his “hatred” of liberals led to his inaccurate predictions of a red wave in November’s midterm elections. “That loathing clouded my judgment,” Carlson told Charlie Kirk, the founder of Turning Point USA, in an interview...www.yahoo.com
Second time for me (I voted for Carter in 1980).
I still think he's too middle-of-the-road corporate for me, But with the shifting of the Overton window during the election and since then, he might be willing to mitigate some of that. And I'd still be happier voting for him than Biden, Hillary, Obama (2nd term, anyway), Kerry, Gore... OK, I liked Clinton, especially, again, 1st term.
Me too. Unfortunately, you know, gay. Are the economically anxious in Ohio, Florida, and other key battleground states ready to vote for a gay man to be president?
I would not consider Ohio and definitely not Florida a battleground state currently. Recently Arizona, Pennsylvania, Wisconsin and Georgia would be considered more swing states. Two of those states have voted in LGBT senators.
I don’t have confidence that the majority of voters in swing states in a presidential election will vote for a gay candidate. I’d love to be wrong on this. I’d by far be more comfortable if we based our elections for president on the popular vote. I am far more confident that a gay candidate would win an election where the popular majority throughout the nation decided decided the outcome.
