What's new

Answer this question correctly

Damn amateur. Women need to feel courted. You don't have to actually court them. Just make them think you are.

Dude, if I were any more ****ing romantic I'd have to buy a hotel to house kids .. well, either, that or get better at protection.

I've got the sweeping them off their feet down.. I may fail in other areas of life, but not there.
 
Dude, if I were any more ****ing romantic I'd have to buy a hotel to house kids .. well, either, that or get better at protection.

I've got the sweeping them off their feet down.. I may fail in other areas of life, but not there.

Yeah nothing screams romance like 9 months of a extra hormonal woman.
 
The question has already been answered and explained. You can stop with your wrong answers now, morans.
 
Okay, I'll give you a real math question (that requires no advanced knowledge to prove). One Brow, this isn't intended for you. So give others a chance.

The number 0.999999...

A) Has precisely the same value as 1.
B) Is less than 1 by a infinitely small amount.
C) There is no way to answer this question conclusively.

And explain your answer.
 
Okay, I'll give you a real math question (that requires no advanced knowledge to prove). One Brow, this isn't intended for you. So give others a chance.

The number 0.999999...

A) Has precisely the same value as 1.
B) Is less than 1 by a infinitely small amount.
C) There is no way to answer this question conclusively.

And explain your answer.

Most would say B but I suppose C is correct as it is tough answer conclusively based on its' unknown context. For example, in areas of science where math may be a specific known quantity, to say it is an infinitely small amount could be understating the difference in value between 0.999999999999... and 1.0000000000000...

Perhaps I'm overthinking this though.
 
Just to make sure it's clear, the three dots after 0.999999 indicate that it repeats forever.
 
Okay, I'll give you a real math question (that requires no advanced knowledge to prove). One Brow, this isn't intended for you. So give others a chance.

The number 0.999999...

A) Has precisely the same value as 1.
B) Is less than 1 by a infinitely small amount.
C) There is no way to answer this question conclusively.

And explain your answer.

B - I don't have any long explanation. It just seems obvious on the surface. I'm not certain one could say .99999999999999999999 is exactly the same as 1 .. but I could see someone saying they're virtually the same number if the .999's go on infinitely .. then there's no end, therefore making it nearly impossible to say just how short of 1 the number comes .. it's inifinitely small.
 
Okay, I'll give you a real math question (that requires no advanced knowledge to prove). One Brow, this isn't intended for you. So give others a chance.

The number 0.999999...

A) Has precisely the same value as 1.
B) Is less than 1 by a infinitely small amount.
C) There is no way to answer this question conclusively.

And explain your answer.

A and B
 
I would say the answer isn't given.
It would be a 33% chance.
You only truly have 3 choices: 25%, 50%, and 60%.
But there is no real correct answer because of the logical paradox.
 
A much easier question below.














Dutch+Driving+Test%5B2%5D.jpg
 
You got to give an explanation.

The way I think of it is

1/9 = .11111...
1/9 * 9 = 1
.11111... * 9 = .99999...
.99999... = 1

As for why subtracting something infinitely small doesn't alter the value, call it a educated guess. Unless you subtract an infinite number of infinitely small amounts. But I'm no expert on "infinitely small". Trout is probably your man there.
 
The way I think of it is

1/9 = .11111...
1/9 * 9 = 1
.11111... * 9 = .99999...
.99999... = 1

As for why subtracting something infinitely small doesn't alter the value, call it a educated guess. Unless you subtract an infinite number of infinitely small amounts. But I'm no expert on "infinitely small". Trout is probably your man there.

That's correct. The answer is A. There is no difference between 1 and 0.9999...

Your proof is good. The one I usually give is this:

1/3 = 0.333...
Multiplying each by 3 would give either:

(1/3)*3= 3/3=1
or
0.333...*3= 0.999...

The two are completely identical. The number 0.999... can be represented by the infinite sequence [(9/10)+(9/100)+(9/1000)....] Where each item represent a decimal spot. The series adds up to 1.
 
That's correct. The answer is A. There is no difference between 1 and 0.9999...

Your proof is good. The one I usually give is this:

1/3 = 0.333...
Multiplying each by 3 would give either:

(1/3)*3= 3/3=1
or
0.333...*3= 0.999...

The two are completely identical. The number 0.999... can be represented by the infinite sequence [(9/10)+(9/100)+(9/1000)....] Where each item represent a decimal spot. The series adds up to 1.

Or said another way, PKM >>>>>>>>>>> Trout.
 
The way I think of it is

1/9 = .11111...
1/9 * 9 = 1
.11111... * 9 = .99999...
.99999... = 1

As for why subtracting something infinitely small doesn't alter the value, call it a educated guess. Unless you subtract an infinite number of infinitely small amounts. But I'm no expert on "infinitely small". Trout is probably your man there.

If we're talking body fat, hair loss, or lack of testicular fortitude, then you would be correct.
 
Top