Search results

Westbrook isn't a chip winning player, but he still had winning impact at the Wizards. He was terrible at the Lakers, but within our group that actually has shooters, i believe he could play closer to the level he was before (not close to his mvp days, but starter pg level of fringe playoff...

Maybe we could send a high number but not really toxic offer, and sweeten for a sign-and-trade with lower upside pick, like a 2025 Cavs or the 3rd guy we pick with a first If we drafted with all 3 of them instead of a trade up and other thing(s).

I'd rather offer near 25 a year at Trent Jr at a better age and defense (tho you still need the guy choose playing for you) than close to 23 to Clarkson.

Another jazz legend, just like D Rose

Interesting question with Cam Jhonson and Gary Trent Jr is how much should be too much for their current teams not want to match (I know they aren't restricted free agents, but not like teams don't really talk with agents before really legally allowed to), but not too much that It is a bad...

Imagine If he wants something around 20 or close to It, maybe 4 years, and the Jazz wanted more like close to 14 and 3 years. I wouldn't really wanna go much above 16 and 3 years.

So like a Bogie that actually can defend instead of a "remember that xyz honest possessions he played against Lebron and Paul George/Kawhi where they ended up scoring and winning anyway" ?

Clarkson has a special situation. He holds tons of value for us in many different ways, but he's also not a key piece, his next contract gonna be for his beyond 30 years of age, while being a pure scoring, no defense guard (negative to black hole in that end) type of player, the easier one to...

If he stays, we could also throw like +$55m at free agents, not ? I'd feel we'd be good with that too.

We don't need to contend next year, just be at a position to be able to grow into one within the timeline of the players we have, while holding the assets to make the necessary moves to go from good to great. If we land 2 decent rookies and one or two free agents that can shoot (at least one...

Something i'd add here. If he doesn't opt out, and we don't need his space for a FA signing, i guess that Gay could be better kept as an option to aggregate salary for a trade than bought out or dumped for a second

Cam Jhonson can really shoot and defend, wouldn't be a bad target for a toxic offer

As I said, just a joke. Not really a fan of KAT even before factoring Lauri/Kessler. Still think he might get traded in a not very distant future tho

If you're able to pick around at least 6~8, then again around 14~18, and another time at 24~27 (which kinda should allow you a trade up for around 10~12 if you think you have the right guy there and that being better than a third new face, same with your best pick), all while being able to give...

Take this as only joking, cause i don't really fancy him, but KAT problably gonna be traded in the near future to reshape the Wolves around Edwards, and we could offer them their picks, but actually protect them. Imagine having your own pick, but if It is top5, It goes for another team.

I would too. Kinda doubt he would

Am curious at who would we pick with our best selection If we end up around 6~8 and don't win 1st or 2nd in the lottery. Main priority a PG, a big wing ?

We already have Sexton and THT combined for 28m next year, a Rudy Gay staying would be another 6m, a Clarkson new contract would come above 10m, whathever If more like 11 a year (quite the discount) or 18 a year (some overpay). If anything, they could keep Olynyk, be at above one max contract...

Honestly, It had a lot to do with we spending 5 firsts, 3 of them lottery, one of them top 5, on Exum, Trey Burke, a George Hill rental and Rubio. It was bad management simply put.

I'd also consider Gary Trent Jr And not so sure If our chances with Grant are that great