Search results

Kessler probably will be ok at 26 or 27, when maturity takes over kid's softness. No one is gonna give the Jazz anything for him specially after DA traded real players like Olynyk for peanuts.

Samanic almost with the dunk of the year. Can we make him invade Kessler's body somehow?

Projecting 60 against a team that's the definition of a tank. Sooner or later coach will have to take some of the $hit load.

Sit Lewis before he starts to threaten KG spot ;)

That's it. It's fairly obvious decisions have piled up not in a good way.

It's highly difficult to develop young dudes without a minimum structure and at least a floor of real competitiveness. Jazz destroyed that 2 years in a row, last year they decided not to tank properly for VW, and now they decided a late tank in a what almost everybody basketball related...

Most of the time. But why does it matter?

I think voted Zubac type. Today I'd need a 2 levels below option. Kid plays without any kind of attitude... his temperament, competitiveness, focus, thougness are highly suspicious. As of today I don't like him. Potter, Yurt should be ahead of him in the pecking order, and this is not a thing I...

The world crossed my mind. New ownership seems at times more focused on some other aspects of the entertainment/comm/sports business.

I didn't. I did the opposite by objectively defining it. Anyway, it's ok, it's just a futile debate. It bares no weight on the Jazz lacking consistent parameters enclosing their basketball related body of work, which is IMO the issue underlying any debate.

Sure I hope you're right!

Anyone is entitled to define the step variable the way better suits themselves. I prefer to use objective parameters like the timeline between February deadlines, or the set of instances comprised in a season where teams are allowed to make roster changes. Not easy to build a team, but...

He won't if the Jazz continue to kill his game by depleting the team around him.

Fact.

Forever it's not the same for every dude... my forever is not that long.... In fact it's step 2, last season was step 1... and Danny's cookbook nowadays appears to have lots of steps...

You are right about the 3 things you stated here. - Why on earth they did not try to get a chance at VW? There's no right answer to this thing. - The wrong path (or no path) choice most probably will end up with Lauri being traded because I don't think the guy want to not play a postseason...

Markkanen, the same as Clarkson, are not players that will play to their strenghts in isolation or reactive basketball. The former needs a structure because he's not a ballhandler or self creator really, and the later can create but needs to know where space will be or at least a space creation...

What remains without answer is why did they not tank for a real chance at probably the best basketball machine ever... and now they tank for a chance at peanuts Murky as hell.

Great game to watch really.

84 points at halftime. I guess there's no need for further comments.