Search results

Uhuh. Just be open to eating **** tons of crow in the future.

*sigh* Playing excessive minutes increases injury risk...

Good to see Kanter play well like I thought he would.

You guys really want to give then a career ending injury by forcing them to play 40+ a game, huh.

Keep laughing.

If EG isn't interested in playing in NO, he wouldn't be interested in playing here

Excited for the game. Expecting a good game from Kanter. Matches well against Zeller

Uh huh. Right then. Good day.

Joking around/intentionally making non-serious posts in a serious discussion is by definition trolling. Why do you two act as if I care about my "persona" here?

So you advocate trolling?

These players were being called all stars before they even played a minute in college. How is that not hype?

Garnett has 1 MVP, 15 all-star. 9 allnba. If that isn't a superstar, what is? Did you see the post where I laid out my categories? The average draft: 1 bust, 1 repeating all NBA (star), 2-3 guys make a few all-star/allnba, 6-10 solid staters/sixth man (Marvin), 10-15 roleplayers, 20 people gone...

The general you, not you specifically. And you say I deal in absolutes... Yeah, when you buy into a circle jerk that has pumped this up to be one of the greatest drafts in NBA history, record setting, that does make you biased.

because you (people in general) come in and lmao at his attacks. There's nothing else to say. Circlejerk: A group discussion or activity between like-minded individuals that validates mutual biases or goals in a non-confrontational environment. All aboard the hypetrain!

Yeah, after his 3-4 contextomy attacks on me. You know what else has consensus? Circle jerk. Doesn't make them right.

Deron Williams fits into the category of a couple all-star/allnba appearances. Same with Russell Westbrook, Love, and Blake. They are not superstars. Your data proves my point further. Lebron, Paul, wade, Garnett, these are superstars.

Apologize for making a rational argument using statistical data? So wow. Much bias.

Well, when he uses compositional fallacies and contextomy ad hominem, what else is there to say?

Are you NJSerpico? Because your dumbassery is almost legendary.

Do you even understand statistics? Or do you just assume that kids born in 1995 are more talented at basketball then kids born in any other year? Why does this draft have more talent than 2007? Because ESPN analysts are freaking out? There is a 3 out 66 chance this draft is another 84, 96...