Search results

Watch the video. Its about how good you are at the game and how you use your tools better than others with similar tools. It is defined as one of the main reasons why teams have gotten worse at evaluating talent over the last 7 years measured by the amount of top selections in the finals.

FEEL was more about processing speed, situational understanding of game time moments at an NBA level. Jokic's court mapping, Halliburton's playmaking, Stephs depth perception, they didnt say it but Brunsons balance / scoring prowess / wiggle in the paint comes to mind.

If you watched the video you would know. Best FEEL was an "almost mystical" intangible that represents how does that player use his tools, not so much what tools does he have. The example was Giannis vs Caboclo and Stanley Johnson vs Devin Booker.

I posted the trade on fanspo and have had only positive reviews which is atypical on that site.

So, are they keeping him? Because the Rockets are maybe offering Green, the wolves are maybe offering Randle, and the Raptors are offering Barrett. No one is offering anything decent for a 36 year old KD with 1 year left on his contract. Oh yeah, and the Suns locker room is a mess. The more...

Conclusions were interesting... basically there are fewer shortcuts to defining what a top player looks like but FEEL is a big one. So, what players in this draft have the best FEEL?

THAT looks like a top pick... I want one!

How's about this trade? We fix the Suns locker room while saving them gobs of cash. We get 3 picks... 2 for Lauri and 1 for taking on Paul Georges contract. The Sixers get an upgrade on a much better contract for 3 picks.

Yang looks really good according to stats. But just looking at him move he looks like the love child of a 1980s Chinese robot and Andre the Giant. Clearly both matter but I really wonder which matters most.... Stats and Analytics OR How a player pops while watching them?

I missed it. Makes sense.

I am surprised no one has selected Hugh Gonzalez. I think he is first round material for sure. Maybe I missed that someone picked him up.

Blah blah blah... gerbils and Schroder went to the blue oyster bar. The end.

Kongratulations... Was that one too far? I never kon tell.

The Kon jokes are fire btw. King Kon. Knipples. Kon-solidate. Kon-cel culture. Kon you beweeve it - Homestarruner. If we get him then there is going to be a lot of Kon-mentary that will tickle my fancy.

I am concerned about Fears. Really poor shooting numbers. Givony said he is a top 3 - 4 ball handler, but I don't see that translating next to Collier if he can't shoot. Givony also said he is going to be bad next season because he is barely 18. Everytime I do this mental exercise I end up...

Also I am still impressed by the 3+ times we managed to flip Schroeder last spring. I would tell Zanick to work his magic to flip the #18 and or #21 and other assets we pick up moving from 5 to 6/7/8 into more assets. Specifically targeting 2026 draft assets. Thats me.

If we really did get the 3 and 5, I would take VJ, then I would look to trade back the #5 to the highest bidder between thr 6, 7, and 8 teams (Wash, Brooklyn, NOP) and still get Kon or Maluach. Then I would trade Kessler and get a new restart on the build. But I dont think we will get the 3rd...

NOP probably offers 7 and a player. Trey Murphy Herbert Jones Missi (if you have a Walker Kessler trade lined up) Hawkins (meh) All 4 guys have some intrigue. I might be interested in 7 plus a future unprotected. NOP are going to do their thing. Its like trading with the Kangz. Better of...

Nets can offer 8, 19, 26, and 27. I bet they say 8 and 19 but the Jazz ask for more because Washington can offer 6 and 18 which is better. Future picks?