Search results

Great job by Harkless to force the travel. Too bad the refs are dumbasses.

I believe he was using a famous literary technique called sarcasm.

Hardy: “I will poke and prod and dig and sub and flip the team upside down until I find people that want to play hard." Then proceeds to give Harkless 0 minutes while the team no-shows against the Hornets without Lamelo Ball.

By giving them an example to follow.

I am balls deep in the bargaining stage at this point. I don't care if the Jazz lose by 50 every night, I just need to see a string of defensive possessions that isn't "Call my mom sobbing" levels of bad. For the love of God, put Harkless in the main rotation. He's our best on-ball defender...

Can we put Harkless in the game now so our defense can be watchable again.

"How can we get our players to care about defense" says organization that refuses to reward its only players that play defense.

One of the most compelling pieces of evidence that the Jazz are tanking through their lineup choices is that Harkless is apparently only allowed to play after the Jazz are in a huge hole.

Fouling while up 3 with a few seconds left when the opposing team has no timeouts is a no-brainer.

Dang, too bad the Blazers did the "stupid" thing and ensured we can't tie the game now.

We lost multiple games in the Snyder era by not doing that.

I don't care about the outcome, watching the Jazz compete on defense is a blast.

How the hell was Harkless not in the rotation before tonight? Are the Jazz really that bad at evaluating which players have a winning impact and which don't?

Portland seems a bit shell-shocked that somebody (Harkless) is actually defending them.

Don't tell the Jazz that - they might be tempted to pass on him at #1 if they hear he plays defense.

Timeouts don't do any good if you have no answers.

If there's a hill I'm willing to die on with the modern NBA, it's that you can't win a title if you're forced to give big minutes to rotations with multiple awful defenders. You can get away with one really bad defender, but that really bad defender better be rock solid on offense. The...

We are doing nothing good on defense. If you're going to give up an avalanche of wide open threes, you'd think the least you could do is be in better position to rebound any misses, but we can't even do that.

Why do we consistently help off of good 3 point shooters for no particular reason?

No, but then again neither is talking about selling high on a player a week into his career because of it.