For those who are confused, this means Utah basically has 13 million dollars in cap space now, but they just can't sign a guy outright. It requires a little maneuvering. It means they can trade or S&T for a guy making up to 13 million dollars without giving up any players or draft picks, just...
Miami agrees, which is why they're going after Mike Miller. I'm sure Korver is a back-up plan for them, but he'll be gone by the time Miami reaches out.
Nah, you're overthinking it. To be a true contender you need a playmaker, shooters to stretch the floor, and post defense/rebounding. Unfortunately, Utah now has only one of those three ingredients.
I would be glad to see the Jazz pick up a lottery pick in 2011. We're in mini-rebuild mode now. As long as we can build a contending team by Deron's final contract year I will be happy. If he bolts, Jazz are finished for a long, long time.
That is one of the worst arguments of all time. It's like the Jazz deciding to sign John Amaechi because he had a good game when he played against them (true story).
Yea, but the Jazz don't have 80 million dollars to spend on a guy who's not going to deliver a championship to the franchise. I guess if you believe Boozer could bring a championship to Utah then the argument changes, but I'm not sure how anyone could believe that.
You would honestly enjoy getting stomped on in the 1st or 2nd round for the next 3 years? I'd rather lose 60 games and have hope for the future then get stuck in Seattle Sonic purgatory.
What are you talking about? You asked who is worth 80 million dollars, not who would sign for 80 million dollars. And I'm confused as hell. The Jazz do not have 80 million dollars to spend, so what is the point of this?
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.