What's new

Are best starting lineup BY FAR and the Burke myth

I still don't get all of the Trey hate. Last year I was a hater myself, but Trey did a really admirable job going to the bench without whining. He was asked to be our #1 threat off the bench on a bench that couldn't score. So, he shot more shots. See Hayward 2014 (who has all but been elevated to God status on this board). In 2014 everyone was whining about how Hayward's shooting percentage was terrible! Boo hoo! He sucks... blah blah blah. Hayward was asked to shoot more. He did and it took a year to learn to be the go to guy for segments. He wasn't the go to guy in 2013. Trey was asked to shoot more in 2015 and he did so. Fg % dropped. Get over it.

If there are stats to back up the original post that the Jazz were on whatever pace, then there is no reason to call someone a troll. I believe in numbers more than the fickle boob train that many ride on this board. Go Boobs. Bra out.
 
OK, Bra...stats don't lie:

Year #1 - 38% / 33%
Year #2 - 37% / 32%

Very few teams would not jettison a guy that not only shoots that poorly, but takes it upon himself to launch up the 2nd most shots per game on the team. That, my friend, is the very definition of inefficiency.

Yes, Hayward had ONE off year. But he still shot 41% overall that season - and has career avgs of 44%/37%. Pretty laughable you would even TRY to compare the two.
 
OK, Bra...stats don't lie:

Year #1 - 38% / 33%
Year #2 - 37% / 32%

Very few teams would not jettison a guy that not only shoots that poorly, but takes it upon himself to launch up the 2nd most shots per game on the team. That, my friend, is the very definition of inefficiency.

Yes, Hayward had ONE off year. But he still shot 41% overall that season - and has career avgs of 44%/37%. Pretty laughable you would even TRY to compare the two.

Laugh Like ****.

Ignores all stats in thread

Claims stats matter
 
Back
Top