What's new

Boozer's +/- against the Hawks tonight

How is it that, over the wires and the various discussion boards, the information has not crossed over to you yet that the +/- stat is POINTLESS over ONE GAME. Now, I can see why you were excited over the simple number itself, however, given that Boozer is in most of the game, and the Bulls got blown out like a Thailand woman on Mongoloid Way, what the HECK do you expect his +/- to be, genius? What are you, Stephen King? Jesus from Mexico. I swear, topics like these are made for the simple purpose of giving respect to a pre-developed brain, in its neuter stage.

You forgot to sign your post. Are you sure you are the REAL Craig K. Manscill?
 
How is it that, over the wires and the various discussion boards, the information has not crossed over to you yet that the +/- stat is POINTLESS over ONE GAME. Now, I can see why you were excited over the simple number itself, however, given that Boozer is in most of the game, and the Bulls got blown out like a Thailand woman on Mongoloid Way, what the HECK do you expect his +/- to be, genius? What are you, Stephen King? Jesus from Mexico. I swear, topics like these are made for the simple purpose of giving respect to a pre-developed brain, in its neuter stage.


Hey there elder, not to becoming of you.
 
Didn't Jazz of the Deron, Okur and Boozer era get killed by the Hawks? Josh Smith probably matches up really well against Boozer.
 
Chicago is lucky he hasn't tripped over a referee's shoes, and torn an ACL yet.

the Bulls announcers were talking about Boozer's play and all the criticism he's getting - but they feel he's doing a pretty decent job and that it's more that he's just not a good fit for Derrick Rose's style of play - Boozer is an under the basket, clog the lane guy and with Bulls, the lane is supposed to be kept open for D-Rose.

fwiw

(not much probably)
 
Back
Top