What's new
By:

Did Hill finally hit his maximum potential due to quins system?

yamers

yamers

Well-Known Member
Maybe quin's system is an absolute perfect fit for Hill.

I think Quin has a player like hill in his sights for a long time just think about it, he wanted conley so much too. Hill isn't conley, but if you watch these two players play they play a similar style.

I think this is a coach Q type of player.
 
yamers said:
Maybe quin's system is an absolute perfect fit for Hill.

I think Quin has a player like hill in his sights for a long time just think about it, he wanted conley so much too. Hill isn't conley, but if you watch these two players play they play a similar style.

I think this is a coach Q type of player.
Click to expand...

Who the **** knows. I mean, personally, I think it's way too early to say anything about anything in regards to Hill and his level of play. Like most season, this is a marathon and not a sprint.
 
He's an ideal fit, but a lot of it is George Hill is simply really good. He was doing this in Indiana the year Paul George missed most of the season.
 
I think Snyders offense really just needed a PG that was above average, and we havent had that in so many years. Hill is a great player and I really think Snyders offense brings out the best in him...but Hill is a great player regardless
 
I think Hill is benefiting from a team that has had no point guard play or leadership to speak of so there was a niche to fill. Add in the fact that he has some decent talent around him that plays hard and he was destined to come out strong. Now whether he can maintain that over the long-term still remains to be seen, but he moved into a spot tailor made for a player like him and he has responded well to it.

No it has nothing to do with QS system, it fits more the idea that nature, and basketball, abhors a vacuum, and our PGs just plain sucked.
 
Simple.

He was a backup in SA. He was the third option behind a superstar. He was forced to take a diminished role
 
Boris said:
If Hill an Hood keep playing like this we might have 5 all stars. Them two have been insane good.
Click to expand...

Nice thought, but too many players ahead of all our guys. I could see Hayward having a chance. Maybe Gobert. Anyone else is a stretch.
 
Stifle Tower said:
Nice thought, but too many players ahead of all our guys. I could see Hayward having a chance. Maybe Gobert. Anyone else is a stretch.
Click to expand...

Nah mate. Hill is playing at a insane level. If he keeps this up Jazz will win a lot of games an they will have to vote in several. Hayward, Gobert, Hill for sure if Hill keeps this up. Favors an Hood to if significant above .500
 
So then, who starts starting next year, Exum or Hill? If we extend Hill, how long does he start? Frankly, if Hill's better, he should start, and we have a lot of time for Exum to 'grow up' still, to get in his prime. I would extend Hill to the same year that Exum becomes a RFA, so that there can be a natural passing of the torch, but that means that Exum wouldn't start until Hill either leaves or renegotiates his contract to be a bench player. The good news is that Hill seems to be an excellent mentor for Exum.
 
cctrackstar said:
So then, who starts starting next year, Exum or Hill? If we extend Hill, how long does he start? Frankly, if Hill's better, he should start, and we have a lot of time for Exum to 'grow up' still, to get in his prime. I would extend Hill to the same year that Exum becomes a RFA, so that there can be a natural passing of the torch, but that means that Exum wouldn't start until Hill either leaves or renegotiates his contract to be a bench player. The good news is that Hill seems to be an excellent mentor for Exum.
Click to expand...

nice theory, but did you bother to look up when Exum becomes an RFA?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Share this page
Back
Top