Do the Jazz have too many players

[homeytennis]

right now? It seems like we need another big but it seems like we have a glut at the 1, 2 and 3. Could perhaps a 4 or 5 for 1 trade be brewing the Jazz giving some of its pet rocks up for a legitimate NBA player?

 

[Stoked]

No we do not.

Ingles is only a RFA.

Millsap, Cooley, Cotton, Johnson and even Hanlan are non guaranteed deals. They can be dropped at any time

Pleiss and Neto are only rumors at this point.

That leaves the Jazz with Gobert, Favors, Booker, Lyles, Hayward, Hood, Burks, Exum and Burke. 9 players. I think we see Pleiss, Cotton, Ingles, Hanlan and Millsap stick around. 14 players

 

[BENTLEY]

Too many 1s: Exum, Burke, Cotton, Hanlan. (And that's not mentioning Neto). Gotta shed 1 and given the rumored draft day trade of Burke I'm guessing the Jazz have something agreed to that will progress in July.

 

[fishonjazz]

Too many 1s: Exum, Burke, Cotton, Hanlan. (And that's not mentioning Neto). Gotta shed 1 and given the rumored draft day trade of Burke I'm guessing the Jazz have something agreed to that will progress in July.

This

 

[Hotdog]

Do we have more than 15 players?

Math. Use it.

 

[homeytennis]

Do we have more than 15 players?

Math. Use it.

I did and with the players counted above that gives us 17 without signing Jeremy. Perhaps moving Trey and others after July 1 might ease the pain a little.

 

[Bodhi]

I say we get to 20. The **** they fid'na do, fine us? Has anyone called their bluff?

 

[Stoked]

I say we get to 20. The **** they fid'na do, fine us? Has anyone called their bluff?

Hell yea! Sign Butler and Green and add them to our guys.

 

[Jazz Spazz]

I don't think the concern is the number of players, but the players abilities, athleticism, position skill, and chemistry.

If I was Harmony.com I'd contract out with Pro team front offices to find matches for each team's roster.
You can never have too much chemistry, amirite?