Duck Rodgers
Well-Known Member
I've read a couple of Bear Grylls' books in the past year or so that were both over the top good. So I kind of have a positive impression of the guy now. I don't know him, he could be a scum bag, but he seems like a good guy based on the books. Lead an interesting life. And he can really write.....maybe. If he even wrote any parts of them. But that's kind of inconsequential because he is just an entertainer..
But how about politicians for instance? I don't know Mitt Romney personally, so I read his books. Read Obama's books. Have read lot of Ralph Nader, Ron Paul, etc. etc. I don't know how much any of them contributed to those books. What if I voted for them just based on their books and they had nothing to do with them another than stamping their approval?
Or what if somebody targets a college, say Stanford or Columbia, because they liked Thomas Sowell or Joseph Stiliglitz' economic views and was hoping to learn from them because they enjoyed their books? But what if they just had somebody else write them to establish or enhance their credibility and you find out you would have been better of paying the Ghostwriter $60,000/year to be your personal servant/teacher instead of going to school?
Or how about you buy a novel from one of your favorite fiction writers that turns out to be a total stinker....and you never actually find out....but it could have sucked because he never even wrote it.
Or you read a Bill Gross book that he didn't actually write and decide to invest in his bond fund.
And there are probably 100 more derivative scenarios that I'm too stupid to think of. And just not books either. Newspaper columns, music, anything really. It's just weird that credence can be given to someone's opinions/character via books they may have never written that nevertheless say they are written by them. Just seems fraudulent.
But how about politicians for instance? I don't know Mitt Romney personally, so I read his books. Read Obama's books. Have read lot of Ralph Nader, Ron Paul, etc. etc. I don't know how much any of them contributed to those books. What if I voted for them just based on their books and they had nothing to do with them another than stamping their approval?
Or what if somebody targets a college, say Stanford or Columbia, because they liked Thomas Sowell or Joseph Stiliglitz' economic views and was hoping to learn from them because they enjoyed their books? But what if they just had somebody else write them to establish or enhance their credibility and you find out you would have been better of paying the Ghostwriter $60,000/year to be your personal servant/teacher instead of going to school?
Or how about you buy a novel from one of your favorite fiction writers that turns out to be a total stinker....and you never actually find out....but it could have sucked because he never even wrote it.
Or you read a Bill Gross book that he didn't actually write and decide to invest in his bond fund.
And there are probably 100 more derivative scenarios that I'm too stupid to think of. And just not books either. Newspaper columns, music, anything really. It's just weird that credence can be given to someone's opinions/character via books they may have never written that nevertheless say they are written by them. Just seems fraudulent.
Last edited: