I never said "Utahns are characteristically racist."
Dunno if you're sheltered or what, but Utah has a reputation for being a bit too pale, if ya know what I mean.
I never said that rep. is deserved or not. But you automatically made a judgement about me, as you have in other threads.
Conclusion= you're a ignorant d-bag.
Well, the major reasons that Utah has a less than average black population are probably as follows:
1) Most of the mountain western states (your Idaho/Utah/Wyoming/Dakotas/Montanas/etc) have low black populations. In US history the states with large black populations are former slave holding states (ie the south), or large industrial cities where blacks moved to get jobs (Chicago, Oakland, LA, New York, etc). Salt Lake is a decent sized city but nowhere near those cities in size. Hell, Denver is a much larger city and only has a 10% black population.
2) Not that I particularly want to get into a religious debate, but I know that the LDS church prevented blacks from getting into the priesthood until the 70s, and I don't know how much of that institutional racism carried into the community. That being said racism hardly has stopped blacks in history from moving to places, so IMO reason #1 is far more relevant. You don't see a lot of blacks in Montana either, mostly for the reasons outlined above (and as far as I know a church doesn't dominate their politics or state). I'd actually dare say that history has proven that the percentage of people of a race has very little relation to the racism of an area.