Kanter's Potential

[oldtimer]

Vslice02

Kanter did an interview a while back saying he never said that or that he misunderstood the question. He said he wanted to have those qualities not that he has them already. I believe he misunderstood the question which is fair sense English is not his native language.

 

[NCJazz]

For the love of all that is holy, pkm! Why will you not tell us if he is a center or a pf? Why?!? Why?!?

Oooohhh the agony

Perhaps it is because he is a SF in the mold of Toni Kukoc.

 

[Dr. Jones]

For the love of all that is holy, pkm! Why will you not tell us if he is a center or a pf? Why?!? Why?!?

Oooohhh the agony

Rep'ed

 

[LogGrad98]

Ideally, Raja Bell should never dress, but that's not going to happen. If it comes down to a time where everyone is "healthy" and the Jazz are not in the middle of a big stretch of 4 games in 5 nights or a 3 in 3, then Jeremy Evans should be the one to sit. During those hellacious 4 in 5 or 3 in 3, I would not be opposed to having Memo sit occasionally to give his heel/back a rest.

That's reasonable. Let's hope that kind of thing makes sense to Corbin as well.

 

[LogGrad98]

Because his natural skillset is more offensive than defensive (what most here call shot-blocking .. and makes me gag a bit) I'd say PF. I guess I just don;t get the concept ..

Let me explain ........ There may be matchups that Burks can play PG (but he's a 2). Some feel Hayward is a 2 .. some nights he is, others he's a 3 .. Millsap, Jefferson ..

wow .. it's about coaching IN game.

Very hard to pigeon hole Kanter (or anyone else). Unless this is nothing more than message board fooder (only) .. Kanter is a 4/5, depending on matchups.

I agree. I would love to see this lineup sometime this season

PG - Hayward
SG - Memo
SF - Favors
PF - Kanter
C - AJ

The biggest lineup EVER, with NO ONE pigeon-holed. I tell you what.