Lay the Boozer debate to rest....?

[LogGrad98]

Here is the poll. The way I see it we here on JazzFanz fall into one of 4 general categories. The object of the poll is to see how many are in which category.

The categories are as follows:

Category 1

We obviously miss Boozer and he is the reason we were a better team last year, why can't you morons see that?

Category 2

We obviously miss Boozer and he is the reason we were a better team last year, but damned if I am going to ever admit it?

Category 3

Sure Boozer was a nice offensive player but in the long run we will be better off without him for (pick a reason, whatever). He is not the reason we are worse this year than last, if we really are at all.

Category 4

Boozer sucks. That is all there is to it. Not only will we be better in the long run we are better off RIGHT NOW that Boozer is gone. Good riddance, let him ride someone elses bench for a while. The highest paid fan in the arena.

Coming soon, poll about whether we are better this year, or were last year.

 

[Shad]

This debate will never end as long as Sloanfeld's still kickin.

 

[franklin]

I didn't know there was a debate.

How about option 5: We don't like Boozer, and for better or worse, we're glad he is gone and will continue to take cheap jabs at him no matter how much it bugs Sloanfail.

 

[NUMBERICA]

Boozer and Jefferson are about as opposite of players as you'll find that are also both considered revered bigs (whether such an unofficial title is deserved or not). Apples and oranges, and one is gone while one is here. There's no point in talking about it.

For my money, though, I like Boozer more. I said it.

 

[LogGrad98]

Honestly I thought there would be more in Category 2. Huh.


And really this is to help Sloanfield put his demons to rest. Once we establish once and for all the true JFBQ* he can move on with his life and become once again a valued poster instead of being bogged down by Boozer.

Plus after all the threads about Boozer and his oft-debated impact on our current- and previous-year's teams I thought it would be interesting to put it in more objective terms.







* JazzFanz Boozer Quotient

 

[NUMBERICA]

Honestly I thought there would be more in Category 2. Huh.


And really this is to help Sloanfield put his demons to rest. Once we establish once and for all the true JFBQ* he can move on with his life and become a valued poster.







* JazzFanz Boozer Quotient

Because one of these days, he'll be valued around here, right?

 

[LogGrad98]

Because one of these days, he'll be valued around here, right?

In a world where AK is a max-money player and Kevin Costner is considered an "actor" anything is possible.

 

[unluckyseventeen]

Cat 3. Boozer makes our offense run really well, but he gives up as much as he delivers, so there's a wash.

Jefferson is new, still learning and steadily improving. Much better defender (at least he was in the first part of the season). Besides, how many games has Boozer missed already? And Jefferson? Yeah...

 

[LogGrad98]

I didn't know there was a debate.

How about option 5: We don't like Boozer, and for better or worse, we're glad he is gone and will continue to take cheap jabs at him no matter how much it bugs Sloanfail.

I actually debated this option, or something similar, but didn't want to be too trollerish.