What's new
By:

Let Us Say the Rumors Happen...

Stoked

Stoked

Well-Known Member
Contributor
2018 Award Winner
The Trades go down.

Bell to Lakers for an STD.
Big Al and Carroll to the Spurs for Splitter, Leonard and Green
Millsap to Clippers for Bledsoe.

Favors/Splitter
Kanter/Splitter/Evans
Leonard/Hayward/Marvin
Green/Foye/Burks/Murphy
Bledsoe/Mo/Burks/Tinsley/Watson

Let Murphy and Watson go this offseason.

How good do you think the Jazz would be?
 
Stoked said:
The Trades go down.

Bell to Lakers for an STD.
Big Al and Carroll to the Spurs for Splitter, Leonard and Green
Millsap to Clippers for Bledsoe.

Favors/Splitter
Kanter/Splitter/Evans
Leonard/Hayward/Marvin
Green/Foye/Burks/Murphy
Bledsoe/Mo/Burks/Tinsley/Watson

Let Murphy and Watson go this offseason.

How good do you think the Jazz would be?
Click to expand...


Wtf? I thought the Spurs rumor was for Splliter or Leonard, not both.
 
It would meet the Jazz goal of fielding competitive practices.

And it would still keep the fans cunfused about who this team is, and who the principle players are.
 
Stoked said:
The Trades go down.

Bell to Lakers for an STD.
Big Al and Carroll to the Spurs for Splitter, Leonard and Green
Millsap to Clippers for Bledsoe.

Favors/Splitter
Kanter/Splitter/Evans
Leonard/Hayward/Marvin
Green/Foye/Burks/Murphy
Bledsoe/Mo/Burks/Tinsley/Watson

Let Murphy and Watson go this offseason.

How good do you think the Jazz would be?
Click to expand...

You make it look like Hayward would have a limited role

Hayward should be starting at the 2 over Green.

WTF? Stroked
 
Depth chart is a little skewed, I think it would actually be something like this:

Bledsoe/Mo/Tinsley/Watson
Hayward/Burks/Green
Leonard/Green/Marvin
Splitter/Kanter/Marvin
Favors/Kanter

Kinda gives us a log jam with Burks, Green, and Marvin IMO, but that gives us a solid 3-man big rotation and our starting line-up would be amazing! Too bad we wouldn't even sniff something like this.
 
Hack said:
You make it look like Hayward would have a limited role

Hayward should be starting at the 2 over Green.

WTF? Stroked
Click to expand...

I tried to keep hayward in his 6th man role. Feel free to adjust that lineup of players as you wish. Look at the big picture and not the individual pieces.
 
Stoked said:
It was thrown around on here somewhere that the Spurs would consider adding Leonard to the deal for Carroll.
Click to expand...

Ah now it makes more sense because the Spurs would laugh and hang up to any deal where the key pieces being swapped are Leonard and Carroll.
 
Big picture and not the pieces you twats. Adjust as you see fit. I just made sure that people where in appropriate positions.
 
dipship31 said:
Depth chart is a little skewed, I think it would actually be something like this:

Bledsoe/Mo/Tinsley/Watson
Hayward/Burks/Green
Leonard/Green/Marvin
Splitter/Kanter/Marvin
Favors/Kanter

Kinda gives us a log jam with Burks, Green, and Marvin IMO, but that gives us a solid 3-man big rotation and our starting line-up would be amazing! Too bad we wouldn't even sniff something like this.
Click to expand...

WTF? Dipshet

Splitter over Kanter?

Can anyone get this right?

Bledsoe
Hayward
Leonard
Kanter
Favors
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Share this page
Back
Top