What's new

New CBA should help the Jazz keep their rookies

Fishsticks

Banned
This insider article says we more than likely would have been able to keep Dwill had we waited out the lock out, but now that it is done our rookies wont be able to go anywhere. If this is so, I am not sure what all the complaining is about on this board. Maybe we are all misinformed, but if keeping your young talent together is improved in this CBA it appears to be a win to me. Here is the Jazz piece of the insider article written by chad ford and Hollinger.

UTAH JAZZ
How it helps: If the Jazz need the money, the new amnesty clause would help them get either Mehmet Okur or Al Jefferson off the books.

How it hurts: The Jazz may be second-guessing themselves a little for trading Deron Williams. They got very good value for him from the Nets, but with extend-and-trade and sign-and-trade options now curtailed, you have to wonder whether Williams would have left the extra money and years on the table to bolt to another team. The new CBA would have made it harder for him to do so.

The Jazz were also another small-market team that was hoping the new CBA would level the playing field a little more than it did. Revenue sharing will help, but the competitive balance in the league is still out of whack.

Immediate impact (this season): Probably very little. They have one significant free agent, Andrei Kirilenko, whom they can probably afford to re-sign without incurring the luxury tax. Otherwise, the Jazz charted their future as a rebuilding club with the preemptive Deron deal in February. It's tricky to do, but the team has had success with it in the past.

Long-term impact (future seasons): The future of this team is Derrick Favors, Gordon Hayward, Enes Kanter and Alec Burks. The new rules for rookie contracts should protect them from losing any of them if they play up to their potential.
 
Last edited:
This insider article says we more than likely would have been able to keep Dwill had we waited out the lock out, but now that it is done our rookies wont be able to go anywhere. If this is so, I am not sure what all the complaining is about on this board. Maybe we are all misinformed, but if keeping your young talent together is improved in this CBA it appears to be a win to me. Here is the Jazz piece of the insider article written by chad ford and Hollinger.

Long-term impact (future seasons): The future of this team is Derrick Favors, Gordon Hayward, Enes Kanter and Alec Burks. The new rules for rookie contracts should protect them from losing any of them if they play up to their potential.

OK.. But I don't think we could offer all 4 of them max. contracts if they're all playing at an All Star level.

Could be wrong - can anyone confirm?
 
OK.. But I don't think we could offer all 4 of them max. contracts if they're all playing at an All Star level.

Could be wrong - can anyone confirm?

We can only "designate" one player on the team to get the "max" (30% of the cap), however we'd still be able to offer more $ and more years to the rest of the guys as well, but 1 of the 4 would make more dough than the other 3.
 
OK.. But I don't think we could offer all 4 of them max. contracts if they're all playing at an All Star level.

Could be wrong - can anyone confirm?

First, it is pretty tall odds that all 4 of them turn out to be all-stars. If they do, then we will likely be tearing up the NBA and I am sure the Millers will be happy to pay out to keep them together so we can amass double-digit championships.
 
If we get two out of the six players who even merit a serious discussion about max pay then it is a good problem to have. Given the odds, we're probably likely to get approximately one player out of the 6 who is all-star caliber. Right now my money would be on Favors.
 
Back
Top