What's new
By:

Picked up NBA 2K16 last night

King Cy said:
Just a fyi, overall team rank is the aggregate ranking of all the players on the roster, so having guys like Cotton/Pleiss/Cooley/Jarrett really lower the overall ranking.
Click to expand...

You realize that's the case for all teams . . . ? As in, I think every NBA team has 5 guys that lower the overall ranking...
 
GoFriars said:
You realize that's the case for all teams . . . ? As in, I think every NBA team has 5 guys that lower the overall ranking...
Click to expand...

No, if it's like last year, they dont do the full teams for some of the classic teams. Like they only do 8 guys, then the last 7 are automatically generated generic players with super low ratings. So some classic teams are ranked much lower because of that. Not sure if it's just them being lazy or not feeling like spending money for the rights to bench guys on teams most fans won't really care about.

Also for current teams, Jazz have more super unknown/minimum contract back-end roster than most teams do.
 
King Cy said:
Once again, overall rank is influenced by the end of the bench and reserves. Those Utah teams had really ****ty benches and really ****ty deep reserves.
Click to expand...

Our mid 90s teams did not have "****ty benches". You are thinking of early 90s.
 
King Cy said:
Once again, overall rank is influenced by the end of the bench and reserves. Those Utah teams had really ****ty benches and really ****ty deep reserves.
Click to expand...
Aren't most teams 11th, 12th, 13th, 14th, and 15th players kind of crappy?

Also, don't they take into account stockton, malone, and hornacek being really really good and having a great head coach?
 
fishonjazz said:
Aren't most teams 11th, 12th, 13th, 14th, and 15th players kind of crappy?

Also, don't they take into account stockton, malone, and hornacek being really really good and having a great head coach?
Click to expand...

King Cy said:
No, if it's like last year, they dont do the full teams for some of the classic teams. Like they only do 8 guys, then the last 7 are automatically generated generic players with super low ratings. So some classic teams are ranked much lower because of that. Not sure if it's just them being lazy or not feeling like spending money for the rights to bench guys on teams most fans won't really care about.

Also for current teams, Jazz have more super unknown/minimum contract back-end roster than most teams do.
Click to expand...
Nm
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Share this page
Back
Top