Its getting really annoying about a lot of people complaining about certain posters. You expect the guys to be perfect on here. A lot of posters have weaknesses and everyone focuses on every little thing someone does wrong.
Viny- Doesn't post substance, can't finish complete thoughts and is lazy. Well, hate to tell ya but he put up great posts and had much better energy when we were winning. I would rather have him over Sloanfeld any day of the week and best of all, he posts through hangovers and carried the board practically the whole year. And then people say he can't analyze basketball cause he is undersized. Here are some names people but look at their post count: Chad Feldheimer(1,866), Favors Flave(192) and then a lot of other people still posting have less than 500 posts. Then look at their stats. Chad Feldheimer has 7 rep, Favors Flave has 1 rep, Sloanfeld has no rep, Beantown 3. I mean if we had any of these guys I bet you would be saying BAN THEM BECAUSE THEY ARE MAKING CRAPPY POSTS.
The main concern is moderation. Maybe if we banned differently we would be a better message board. We seem to be the only baord in the NBA that doesn't try and ban Boozer homers. We let the opposing complainers make new posts and then complain about them, leaving the rest of the threads available to be hijacked by Sloanfeld. I think with an adjusted posting criteria a lot of the poster's posts would improve.
