What's new
By:

SI.com Top 100 Players......

I really doubt any of them would be excluded from the top 100, that would be ultimate disrespect. We will probably see Favors and Rudy in the top 50 and Hayward in the top 30.
 
3 top 50 easily. I say Hayward top 35, Favors and Gobert top 45.
 
♪alt13 said:
Kobe @54 lol
Click to expand...

They had him 24 last year, which was even more laughable. I can respect #54. No one wants to be the publication that completely ****s on Kobe then he turns around and has a good year. Amin Elhassan is pretty much the only media member that completely ****s on him.
 
I think that Gobert should be top 10.
Favors and Hayward should be top 30.

They probably won't be that high though. Should be. But won't be.
 
Hack said:
I think that Gobert should be top 10.
Favors and Hayward should be top 30.

They probably won't be that high though. Should be. But won't be.
Click to expand...

Hard to argue that they should be that high when they haven't made the playoffs as a group. You can't put them that high, it wouldn't be deserved.
 
Thadeus Young is 75, so yeah, Favors is top 50.

Gobert can become a top 15 or 20 player this season if he can progress offensively, or at least hit a decent % of his free-throws. In every other aspect, he's already in Dwight Howard territory.
 
Cy said:
Hard to argue that they should be that high when they haven't made the playoffs as a group. You can't put them that high, it wouldn't be deserved.
Click to expand...

I get that point, but I disagree with it. I think it's about how good I would think they'd be next year, not necessarily what they just did, even though that plays a part in how you see them.

If I were building a team that I wanted to win this year with, Gobert is my number 1 choice in center. He'd be a high priority on my list. I'd take him top10. I like his defense that much. I really believe it translates to winning. I don't think our success last year in the second half is a fluke. It's also not his fault they decided to wait so long to play him. Had they started him in the first place. We might have made the playoffs.
 
HantlersE.jpg
 
Last edited:
Hack said:
I get that point, but I disagree with it. I think it's about how good I would think they'd be next year, not necessarily what they just did, even though that plays a part in how you see them.
Click to expand...

Hence why you drafted Shabazz and Lavine. Potential matters to you. Not results.
 
ONE LOVE said:
Wow...


I think Hayward and Gobert should definitely be in top 50. But Favors... not so sure.
Click to expand...
How is it that our best player should be lower ranked than our 2nd and 3rd best players? Favors is seriously underrated by Jazz fans. I understand an argument that Hayward is better than Favors, personally I think Favors is better. But Rudy right now is not better than either of them. He is simply not as good as Favors right now.
 
gregbroncs said:
How is it that our best player should be lower ranked than our 2nd and 3rd best players? Favors is seriously underrated by Jazz fans. I understand an argument that Hayward is better than Favors, personally I think Favors is better. But Rudy right now is not better than either of them. He is simply not as good as Favors right now.
Click to expand...

Sorry I didn't make it clear, I meant not so sure SI.com would rank Favors in top 50.
 
ONE LOVE said:
Sorry I didn't make it clear, I meant not so sure SI.com would rank Favors in top 50.
Click to expand...

Why?? Even none jazz fans should be able to know there isn't 50 players better then Favors. So SI.com should know. Lol. It's not rocket science.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Share this page
Back
Top