What's new
By:

That goal tending call on Favors. Refs missed it in person but also on the replay....

yamers

yamers

Well-Known Member
sad..just....SAD.


godzillafacepalmgodzillx.jpg
 
That flagrant foul on Favors sure sucked too! ... I'm sure that J.J. Barea just ran up and ran into favors
 
reignman40 said:
Well the ball clearly didn't change direction or spin. The refs just plain suck these days.
Click to expand...
Was there enough evidence to overturn the original call? I don't think so. I watched the replay and thought a couple of times Favors' fingertip may have touched the ball, just enough to deflect it a bit higher on the glass. The other times I was certain he missed the ball. Refs weren't sure and thus the original call stood.
.
AS for the flagrant, yes, that was a good call. There's no doubt Derrick was fouled first, but refs are usually going to notice the retaliation, not the original foul, especially if it's close to the body. Barea is a punk, but the original contact was unintentional. Favors turned to run and ran right into J.J. Then Barea gave him a push, which should have been called, but Favors overreacted with a hard shove.
 
MoTown16 said:
Was there enough evidence to overturn the original call? I don't think so. I watched the replay and thought a couple of times Favors' fingertip may have touched the ball, just enough to deflect it a bit higher on the glass. The other times I was certain he missed the ball. Refs weren't sure and thus the original call stood.
.
AS for the flagrant, yes, that was a good call. There's no doubt Derrick was fouled first, but refs are usually going to notice the retaliation, not the original foul, especially if it's close to the body. Barea is a punk, but the original contact was unintentional. Favors turned to run and ran right into J.J. Then Barea gave him a push, which should have been called, but Favors overreacted with a hard shove.
Click to expand...

your right and I understand the Refs in no way can get every call right ... but still it was very cheap
 
MoTown16 said:
Was there enough evidence to overturn the original call? I don't think so. I watched the replay and thought a couple of times Favors' fingertip may have touched the ball, just enough to deflect it a bit higher on the glass. The other times I was certain he missed the ball. Refs weren't sure and thus the original call stood.
.
AS for the flagrant, yes, that was a good call. There's no doubt Derrick was fouled first, but refs are usually going to notice the retaliation, not the original foul, especially if it's close to the body. Barea is a punk, but the original contact was unintentional. Favors turned to run and ran right into J.J. Then Barea gave him a push, which should have been called, but Favors overreacted with a hard shove.
Click to expand...

problem is
barea should have gotten a t long before that.
so it did not escalate.
he was trying to escalate the situation.
refs should have WARNED HIM.
and because of prior stuff happening with barea it should have just been called a hard foul
 
DutchJazzer said:
problem is
barea should have gotten a t long before that.
so it did not escalate.
he was trying to escalate the situation.
refs should have WARNED HIM.
and because of prior stuff happening with barea it should have just been called a hard foul
Click to expand...

Barea had a little bit of Stockton like tenacity last night. Frustrating when he's on the other team but very endearing if he's doing it for your team.
 
The Favors flagrant review was even worse.

--Barea throws his shoulder into Favors
--Favors barely pushes back
--Barea clearly flops
--Clear flop
 
franklin said:
The Favors flagrant review was even worse.

--Barea throws his shoulder into Favors
--Favors barely pushes back
--Barea clearly flops
--Clear flop
Click to expand...

Yes Barea sold it, but I think Favors pushed him pretty good since he was pissed off.
 
MoTown16 said:
Was there enough evidence to overturn the original call? I don't think so. I watched the replay and thought a couple of times Favors' fingertip may have touched the ball, just enough to deflect it a bit higher on the glass. The other times I was certain he missed the ball. Refs weren't sure and thus the original call stood.
.
AS for the flagrant, yes, that was a good call. There's no doubt Derrick was fouled first, but refs are usually going to notice the retaliation, not the original foul, especially if it's close to the body. Barea is a punk, but the original contact was unintentional. Favors turned to run and ran right into J.J. Then Barea gave him a push, which should have been called, but Favors overreacted with a hard shove.
Click to expand...

If the ball went higher on the glass, then it is a blocked shot, not a goal tend. It is only a goal tend if favors hits it after it comes off the glass. I think the refs missed the call.

As for the flagrant, it should have been a T.
 
  • Like
Reactions: ATB
That's true b-line! the ball wasn't heading down ... those Ref's sure blew it I wish there was someway us fans could complain to the NBA
 
If favors did touch it, the ball was still going up and it wasn't even in the cylinder... so that was stupid.
 
b_line said:
If the ball went higher on the glass, then it is a blocked shot, not a goal tend. It is only a goal tend if favors hits it after it comes off the glass. I think the refs missed the call.

As for the flagrant, it should have been a T.
Click to expand...
I'd have to watch it again, but I think the ball was on the way down. I think it was a missed call, but there wasn't clear enough evidence to overturn.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Share this page
Back
Top