What's new
By:
Filters

OKC Kanter: 15.8/10.2/2.2 FG 57%

C

couscous

Well-Known Member
And I thought he don't/can't pass the ball ... why didn't he play like that for us!?

He isn't event playing big minutes neither and taking just 10 shots a game. His PER-36 is 19.1/11/2.

OKC are 4-1 since Kanter trade. Both teams win with Kanter trade?
 
It just kills me... to think that we can have Gobert next to Enes for the next 5-10 years. One defensive monster and one offensive monster, kinda like Gasol and ZBo. It hurts me to say this but I think we should've traded Favors and start Kanter and Gobert.
 
Why? Favors is better both offensively and defensively than Kanter?
 
Post this **** in general sports. We've already established that he's playing well in his current situation, which will change dramatically with everyone healthy. Nothing worth talking about until we see how he fits in when KD and Westbrook are dominating that offense.
 
ya don't post this **** in utah jazz forum. he doesn't play for the jazz. ugh
 
You know, I think the primitive offense of OKC is better than our system. It lets the talented basketball players perform their best.

Along with Kanter, I think Exum would be better in an OKC environment. He has to think way too much in this Jazz system and it's rattled him to the point that he can no longer make wide open threes. I honestly feel a lot of this is Snyder's fault. Sure he developed Exum into a good defensive player, but he's done an absolute horrible job when it comes to his development on the offensive end.
 
magic said:
You know, I think the primitive offense of OKC is better than our system. It lets the talented basketball players perform their best.

Along with Kanter, I think Exum would be better in an OKC environment. He has to think way too much in this Jazz system and it's rattled him to the point that he can no longer make wide open threes. I honestly feel a lot of this is Snyder's fault. Sure he developed Exum into a good defensive player, but he's done an absolute horrible job when it comes to his development on the offensive end.
Click to expand...

then that must mean Snyder's system is Advanced. Which means he is a master coach.
 
couscous said:
It just kills me... to think that we can have Gobert next to Enes for the next 5-10 years. One defensive monster and one offensive monster, kinda like Gasol and ZBo. It hurts me to say this but I think we should've traded Favors and start Kanter and Gobert.
Click to expand...
I'd rather have Favors for $4M less. He doesn't have a diva attitude or an agent who is crazy.
 
just a symptom of a perpetual rebuild. i hear paul millsap aint doin too shabby either. matthews, etc.
who will be the next victim of the perp rebuild? maybe alec. jazz is just becomin a developmental team.
thx alot mgmt.
 
magic said:
You know, I think the primitive offense of OKC is better than our system. It lets the talented basketball players perform their best.

Along with Kanter, I think Exum would be better in an OKC environment. He has to think way too much in this Jazz system and it's rattled him to the point that he can no longer make wide open threes. I honestly feel a lot of this is Snyder's fault. Sure he developed Exum into a good defensive player, but he's done an absolute horrible job when it comes to his development on the offensive end.
Click to expand...

I'd rather mold our offense after the Spurs system (5 championships) than the Thunder's primitive system (0 championships).
 
why are all these Kanter threads coming up?
He is not a Jazzman anymore.
BTW, This trade was a classic example of those win-win trades.
Good for both parties.
Kanter is doing fine in a sound bball environment and so do Jazz.
so?
Good riddance!
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Share this page

Top