fishonjazz
Well-Known Member
Contributor
2018 Award Winner
2019 Award Winner
20-21 Award Winner
2022 Award Winner
2023 Award Winner
2024 Award Winner
2025 Award Winner
ThisGobert, followed by Quin.
ThisGobert, followed by Quin.
I'd argue Exum. If Exum becomes an All Star, we win titles. If he doesn't, we will be Deron-level Jazz.
That's a terrible argument.
We'll be good with or without Exum.
Were the "Deron-level Jazz" a team that was "good"?
So we've accepted that arbitrary evaluation as fact?
wtf are you talking about? tia
I'm saying that your statement assumes that Hack agrees with Green's assessment of the team's potential with and without Exum. If we agree with Green's evaluation, then yes, he's right. Deron's team was "good". But that statement is completely random. There is no explanation of why this team minus Exum peaks at that level, or even what exactly is meant by "Deron level good". Deron's team competed in a different environment, and the achievements of that team would be different today. Or does he simply mean Deron's team at its peak relative to the strength of the conference? Meaning that we'll peak as a strong playoffs team, but not a real contender. There is hardly any reasoning to back Green's statement, and thus no reason to accept it.
I love what Gobert has done so don't get me wrong. But I think he may be getting a little over-hyped on this board and other places right now. Hayward and Favors are still our best players right now. Though I'd put Gobert and Hood very close to them. I'd also say Gobert and Hood both have the ability to possibly surpass them in the next few years.Love QS and DL and cannot argue against them. But you still need serious talent to win it all and I think Rudy might be that guy. QS and DL will keep them forever competitive, Rudy just might get us a parade.
tl;dr
I could tell by midway through that you'd over-thought things. Besides, "good" was Hack's word not green's. So, you over-thought things and got them wrong.