What's new

'Scientific Research is flawed-- and it's time we embrace it'

  • Thread starter Thread starter Deleted member 848
  • Start date Start date
why does the thread need to turn to that topic? Srs

Dal's thread on science studies is cool.
 
Good Lord you two...I'll start just to get th eball rolling.

I think the tenure system as it is now is a joke. It provides bad teachers protection and lowers the overall quality of teachers.

I think it should be revamped to consider performance as determined by managers, fellow teachers and the school board (reps of the public). It should be much easier to fire bad teachers. Over all teacher pay should be dramatically increased as should the requirements and education to become a teacher in the first place.

Will that start the topic?

Well I don't know much about it, so I figured I'd ask you. Good grief man.

Good lord, you sissies. The whole point of tenure was a sub-point of a sub-point to the preceding discussion. I didn't want to launch into a full-scale rundown of tenure issues until I understood why it was suddenly so important.

Stop telling me to calm down and calm down yourselves.
 
Good Lord you two...I'll start just to get th eball rolling.

I think the tenure system as it is now is a joke. It provides bad teachers protection and lowers the overall quality of teachers.

I think it should be revamped to consider performance as determined by managers, fellow teachers and the school board (reps of the public). It should be much easier to fire bad teachers. Over all teacher pay should be dramatically increased as should the requirements and education to become a teacher in the first place.

Will that start the topic?

The hell you getting on me for? I'm not trying to do anything except ask the dude a question because he's actually been involved in that field and I haven't.
 
Good lord, you sissies. The whole point of tenure was a sub-point of a sub-point to the preceding discussion. I didn't want to launch into a full-scale rundown of tenure issues until I understood why it was suddenly so important.

Stop telling me to calm down and calm down yourselves.

I'm surprised the guy who calls people misogynysts and what not would call somebody a sissy as a derogatory remark. No need to insult anybody man.
 
Good lord, you sissies. The whole point of tenure was a sub-point of a sub-point to the preceding discussion. I didn't want to launch into a full-scale rundown of tenure issues until I understood why it was suddenly so important.

Stop telling me to calm down and calm down yourselves.

The hell you getting on me for? I'm not trying to do anything except ask the dude a question because he's actually been involved in that field and I haven't.

Because the two of you act like this over and over. So I just jumped in before this got started, again.
 
wtf just happened here?

should I have just given a talk on tenure issues without understanding why? would that have helped everybody's feelings??
 
wtf just happened here?

should I have just given a talk on tenure issues without understanding why? would that have helped everybody's feelings??

Nothing happened here that doesn't always happen when you and Howard or Spazz talk.

A bunch of dancing.

My .02

All I was able to do was jump to the conclussion.
 
Nothing happened here that doesn't always happen when you and Howard or Spazz talk.

A bunch of dancing.

My .02

All I was able to do was jump to the conclussion.

Has "Howard" been around long enough for this kind of presumption? It sounds like you're fully aware of who he was.
 
Has "Howard" been around long enough for this kind of presumption? It sounds like you're fully aware of who he was.

I'm a mod. We know everything.

Howard is Howard. Didn't the two of you just do this dance in the Christianity thread?
 
I just asked you to clarify your interests, man.

False. You asked me my thoughts on the subject. My interest was I thought you would have a good perspective on the subject and I was curious as to what you thought of it since you brought it up.
 
False. You asked me my thoughts on the subject. My interest was I thought you would have a good perspective on the subject and I was curious as to what you thought of it since you brought it up.

You can read what I wrote. It's sitting right there on the first page. Changes to tenure are a variable in the discussion of science and the context in which it is enacted.

It seemed like you wanted to make a different issue out of tenure. Did you want me to clarify my earlier thoughts? Did you want me to expound upon the subject more broadly? Why? If I ask you to share your thoughts first, I could be looking for a clue.
 
That escalated quickly.
 
Back
Top