♪alt13
Well-Known Member
He is not "transabled", he has "dissociative limb disorder".
Unlike Vinny I am tired of all these definitions. It is going overboard
Pretty sure he is "one hand Jason".
He is not "transabled", he has "dissociative limb disorder".
Unlike Vinny I am tired of all these definitions. It is going overboard
Like you, I see no difference between a person identifying with a different race and a person identifying with a different gender. If we are supposed to call the man identifying as a woman "her" then we should also call the white person identifying as black "african-american" or whatever they would like to identify their race. I really wish someone who disagrees with this stance would provide a reasonable argument why this is not the case.
And Butchy continues being a troll. Not surprising.
Like you, I see no difference between a person identifying with a different race and a person identifying with a different gender. If we are supposed to call the man identifying as a woman "her" then we should also call the white person identifying as black "african-american" or whatever they would like to identify their race. I really wish someone who disagrees with this stance would provide a reasonable argument why this is not the case.
Where are all the people who were telling me that you couldnt be transracial? Dala, JEJ, and somebody else...what are your thoughts on this? Is she crazy, mental problems, or can people be transrace now?
The female gender doesn't have the history of appropriation that black culture does.
This argument simply lacks intellectual sophistication. Equating both examples as the same is quite simply laziness. See my response to Hantlers below.
It's a much more complicated, nuanced issue than you're making it.
First of all, there is a long history of white people appropriating essentially every non-white culture in America, to the point where things like a 'mohawk' have lost all cultural significance in the realm of american popular culture, due to said appropriation.
There is a very long-standing history of whites appropriating black culture in America. It's an incredibly sensitive phenomenon, as it's been happening for centuries & it's still ongoing. Having a white woman disguise her caucasian roots, and work in a leadership role in a black community organization is incredibly sketchy, in the backdrop of America's appropriating culture. That's why there's a big controversy surrounding this-- and that's why it isn't really comparable to Caitlyn Jenner. The female gender doesn't have the history of appropriation that black culture does.
Since race is a social construction, it's technically possible for you to identify yourself with any racial/cultural phenomenon. However, the majority of those who try to identify as another race do so while adopting terms that are at odds with the true tenets of the racial group they are trying to adopt. Due to the probability of this phenomenon, along with the longstanding history of appropriation, it's considered in bad-taste for a white person to call themselves black in America.
Example of race being fluid: there are many examples of white people growing up in Indigenous reserves, and being fully considered "indigenous" despite their biological makeup.
So, she is black but distasteful? She is distasteful because many white kids like hip-hop?
Caitlyn Jenner is a woman and tasteful. Her decision has taste because men don't generally listen to Celine Dione?
yup. Cuz that's what it means to be black, and a woman.
yup. Cuz that's what it means to be black, and a woman.
Are you black or a woman? Then how would you know?
But my stance is yes she can classify as black. Doesn't mean that other blacks, or non blacks for that matter, have to accept her as black though. Personally I don't care. She wants to be black? cool with me.
Guys, we need to have cultural assimilation but we need to discourage white people from taking things from other cultures that they like.
"Since gender is a social construction, it's technically possible for you to identify yourself with any gender phenomenon. However, the majority of those who try to identify as another gender do so while adopting terms that are at odds with the true tenets of the gender group they are trying to adopt. Due to the probability of this phenomenon, along with the longstanding history of appropriation, it's considered in bad-taste for a male person to call themselves female in America."
Funny how this works if you just switch a few words.
"in the backdrop of America's appropriating culture."
So hip-hop isn't a symbol of black culture? One that has been appropriated by whites? Maybe you should give me a better example of what you are talking about.
If Bruce Jenner can be a woman, why cant this lady be black?
Are you black or a woman? Then how would you know?
But my stance is yes she can classify as black. Doesn't mean that other blacks, or non blacks for that matter, have to accept her as black though. Personally I don't care. She wants to be black? cool with me.
So then do women, or non-women have to accept Jenner as a woman? Because I could be wrong, and please correct me, but I believe your argument was that we should be happy for Jenner and accept his decision. It's been a while so I could be wrong.
You remember when the "melting pot" was a GOOD idea? What the hell good is multiculturalism if you can't appropriate the best parts of everyone's culture? Even Marxism is down with this. "I'm sorry, Miss, you can't eat that falafel without wearing this burkha, because you are unfairly appropriating our culture." SMH
Does it? Copy and paste do not an argument make.