What's new

I AM SO FREAKING EXCITED

We have a chance to add depth to our team. This is why we're excited. If you don't like it go hang out with John Lucas III....
 
Even if we keep the pick and draft whoever, all this trade speculation and chatter has made today fun and exciting, especially on JF.
 
Sure...we should have traded the picks that became Paul Millsap, Deron, Gobert, Hayward, Hood, Burke, Exum, etc. Should never have brought Wesley Matthews to camp. Rookies CAN and DO contribute! The main difference now is the Jazz have 5 projected starters AND a lottery pick. Whoever they pick can still get minutes but he'll have to earn them. I think that's a GREAT position to be in.

How many number twelve picks have impacted Jazz?
 
Is it 5:00 yet?

b683.jpg
 
[size/HUGE] boobs [/size];1069813 said:
How many number twelve picks have impacted Jazz?

Oh, so we can only consider the actual #12 spot? Then by all means let's trade it for #13,#16 or #27 because that's where Stockton, Malone and Gobert were drafted. And by all means DO NOT try to trade up to #3; that netted us Enes Kanter. Sorry, but your post looking at just players at #12 is simply unbelievable...and that's the kindest word I can use.
 
OP is skeeered, its understandable, no one wants to draft a player knowing a high % bust at 12.
But there is no skipping steps. Gobert and Hayward were once rookies. What a terrible place we would be in if
we traded even one of them for a "vet" on the level of a Trevor Booker.
 
Oh, so we can only consider the actual #12 spot? Then by all means let's trade it for #13,#16 or #27 because that's where Stockton, Malone and Gobert were drafted. And by all means DO NOT try to trade up to #3; that netted us Enes Kanter. Sorry, but your post looking at just players at #12 is simply unbelievable...and that's the kindest word I can use.

My friends can someone explain into English what this guy says? There is Malone available at 13?

I ask simple question I do not understand this hyper ventilating response.
 
So I was right. Yawn.
 
[size/HUGE] boobs [/size];1070138 said:
My friends can someone explain into English what this guy says? There is Malone available at 13?

I ask simple question I do not understand this hyper ventilating response.
Simply that great players have always been available lower than #12. And the same will hold true in this draft. We'll be talking about the guy we could have drafted at #12 who became an all-star.
 
Regardless of the young kid chosen at 12, I'm excited at the upcoming season for all the reasons from last season.
 
Regardless of the young kid chosen at 12, I'm excited at the upcoming season for all the reasons from last season.
Yep me too.
Future is so bright for this extremely young and talented team. I expect playoffs next year and one of the most enjoyable seasons ever
 
Regardless of the young kid chosen at 12, I'm excited at the upcoming season for all the reasons from last season.

Absolutely. But the draft has been a non-event. I was hoping for some flash and flair and a move that said "let's do this thing!" out loud. Instead we pick a safe player who by all accounts will probably be ok. Not a bad draft, not anything to write home about either.
 
Back
Top