karl malone
Well-Known Member
Imo, people are over-thinking this. Yes, Lillard is limited defensively, but he is also 24 years old, under contract long-term, & a prolific scorer. Yes, Exum has the potential to become a great two-way player, but he is also far from a guarantee to reach that potential, as well as far away from reaching his potential, if he in fact does so. As much as I believe in Exum, he is highly unlikely to ever develop into the caliber of offensive player that Lillard currently is. When evaluating our roster & taking team needs into consideration, a primary scoring option has to be near the top of the list.
One of the benefits to having an elite defensive frontcourt is that you have the luxury of hiding a defensive liability, & considering the offensive skill-set that Lillard would bring, I believe that his impact on offense would outweigh any defensive deficiencies that would come along with him. While I agree that Hayward is currently the better player between the two (because of his two-way ability), I would make that trade due to Hayward's contract situation as well as the presence of Hood. I'm not sure it would make much sense for POR, but trading Hayward for Lillard could bring the offensive/defensive balance necessary to transform this team into a legitimate championship contender. Exum + Hayward is way too much, but Hayward + another minor asset or 2 would be a great trade for us, imo.
Maybe something along the lines of:
Trd: Hayward/Burke/OKC 1st/Booker (if necessary for salary cap purposes)
Rec: Lillard
PG: Lillard/Neto/Cotton
SG: Exum/Burks/Millsap
SF: Hood/Ingles
PF: Favors/Booker/Lyles
C: Gobert/Pleiss
I know this is likely irrelevant as I'm sure POR will instead attempt to build around Lillard &, if for whatever reason they decide not to, are unlikely to trade within the division, I could see that team being top 5-10 offensively & top 5 (if not better) defensively. I love Hayward, but his opt-out clause is something that can't be ignored, & pairing Lillard with Gobert would give us a young superstar on both sides of the ball. The trade may delay our ascent to contention for another year, but it could ultimately set us up for long-term success & an opportunity to win multiple championships.
One of the benefits to having an elite defensive frontcourt is that you have the luxury of hiding a defensive liability, & considering the offensive skill-set that Lillard would bring, I believe that his impact on offense would outweigh any defensive deficiencies that would come along with him. While I agree that Hayward is currently the better player between the two (because of his two-way ability), I would make that trade due to Hayward's contract situation as well as the presence of Hood. I'm not sure it would make much sense for POR, but trading Hayward for Lillard could bring the offensive/defensive balance necessary to transform this team into a legitimate championship contender. Exum + Hayward is way too much, but Hayward + another minor asset or 2 would be a great trade for us, imo.
Maybe something along the lines of:
Trd: Hayward/Burke/OKC 1st/Booker (if necessary for salary cap purposes)
Rec: Lillard
PG: Lillard/Neto/Cotton
SG: Exum/Burks/Millsap
SF: Hood/Ingles
PF: Favors/Booker/Lyles
C: Gobert/Pleiss
I know this is likely irrelevant as I'm sure POR will instead attempt to build around Lillard &, if for whatever reason they decide not to, are unlikely to trade within the division, I could see that team being top 5-10 offensively & top 5 (if not better) defensively. I love Hayward, but his opt-out clause is something that can't be ignored, & pairing Lillard with Gobert would give us a young superstar on both sides of the ball. The trade may delay our ascent to contention for another year, but it could ultimately set us up for long-term success & an opportunity to win multiple championships.