What's new
By:

Current NBA Draft Championship: Hack vs. Cunning Linguist

Who would win in a 7 game series?

  • Total voters
    24
  • Poll closed .
Hack said:
Why do you and Cy keep hammering this point home? As if it matters how many playoffs games they've played.

Spurs lost to the Clippers who had less playoff games played. Warriors beat Memphis who I'm sure had more playoff games played. I could go on and on for ever with examples.

All these players are playing with different players. Better players. You really trying to say that because Davis doesn't have a bunch of experience that means no matter who he played with he would forever just lose every game because he never had prior winning experience? How the hell do you think players end up getting their first playoff wins? They have to start somewhere don't they? They will just start with your dumb *** weak team.

And as a matter of fact, in this competition we have the same amount of experience.

So great point genius. Try again.
Click to expand...

Your density clearly prohibited you from getting the point. In the examples you provided that Clips teams too had a good amount of playoff experience. They just had less than the Spurs.

In this case, my guys have a ton. And they win quite often. Your guys have almost no experience. And they primarily lose in that they do have.
 
My starters and their style of play and strengths and weakness just fit perfectly. I can see a team like that winning 70 games in a season. Hack's is awkward. Favors hates playing center. Martin sucks. There is no wing defense. Parsons is sort of this let me speak out and recruit and act like a leader even though I've never won **** on any level guy. Just a weird combination of guys.
 
Cunning Linguist said:
Your density clearly prohibited you from getting the point. In the examples you provided that Clips teams too had a good amount of playoff experience. They just had less than the Spurs.

In this case, my guys have a ton. And they win quite often. Your guys have almost no experience. And they primarily lose in that they do have.
Click to expand...

2 examples though.
 
Cunning Linguist said:
My starters and their style of play and strengths and weakness just fit perfectly. I can see a team like that winning 70 games in a season. Hack's is awkward. Favors hates playing center. Martin sucks. There is no wing defense. Parsons is sort of this let me speak out and recruit and act like a leader even though I've never won **** on any level guy. Just a weird combination of guys.
Click to expand...

Lol

Give me a break. 70 games? Who the **** you think you got on your team?

If your theory is right. Then One Love should have demolished everybody.

Even with this thing not even having 30 teams, you still couldn't build a super team. You have ok players. No real superstars. Dumbass.
 
Hack said:
Lol

Give me a break. 70 games? Who the **** you think you got on your team?

If your theory is right. Then One Love should have demolished everybody.

Even with this thing not even having 30 teams, you still couldn't build a super team. You have ok players. No real superstars. Dumbass.
Click to expand...

Cry harder.
 
Cunning Linguist said:
Cry harder.
Click to expand...

I don't even care if I win.

The ONLY reason why you'll win is because my haters are out in full fotce. Your team isn't better. Plain and simple.

I have two legit all NBA players. You have a very old Tim Duncan. Who couldn't even make the Allstar team. And a bunch of ok players.

My team would woop your teams ***.
 
Hack said:
I don't even care if I win.

The ONLY reason why you'll win is because my haters are out in full fotce. Your team isn't better. Plain and simple.

I have two legit all NBA players. You have a very old Tim Duncan. Who couldn't even make the Allstar team. And a bunch of ok players.

My team would woop your teams ***.
Click to expand...

Yeah an all nba Iverson and Carmelo just barnstormed through the league. Your team should've been a shoe-in. But I know you don't care so it doesn't matter.
 
Hack said:
I don't even care if I win.

The ONLY reason why you'll win is because my haters are out in full fotce. Your team isn't better. Plain and simple.

I have two legit all NBA players. You have a very old Tim Duncan. Who couldn't even make the Allstar team. And a bunch of ok players.

My team would woop your teams ***.
Click to expand...

Why do you think I lost? My team should have wiped the entire competition.
 
Cunning Linguist said:
Yeah an all nba Iverson and Carmelo just barnstormed through the league. Your team should've been a shoe-in. But I know you don't care so it doesn't matter.
Click to expand...

Are you really trying to compare Carmelo to Anthony Davis?

Do you really think Anthony Davis is a Carmelo like player and not the all defensive defensive player that he is and elite offensive player that he is?

You are retarded.
 
Hack said:
I don't even care if I win.

The ONLY reason why you'll win is because my haters are out in full fotce. Your team isn't better. Plain and simple.

I have two legit all NBA players. You have a very old Tim Duncan. Who couldn't even make the Allstar team. And a bunch of ok players.

My team would woop your teams ***.
Click to expand...

I hate u more then anyone, but I still voted for u. Lol


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 
Hack said:
Are you really trying to compare Carmelo to Anthony Davis?

Do you really think Anthony Davis is a Carmelo like player and not the all defensive defensive player that he is and elite offensive player that he is?

You are retarded.
Click to expand...

My, you're eloquent. What do you do for a living?
 
Hack has two good bigs who have never won a playoff game between them, a volume-shooting PG who is a traffic cone on defense, and a bench full of un-provens. He shouldn't have made it this far.
 
Cmon CL.. Show us what you got. Quit holding back. Bust out some of your cunning linguistics.

We are all waiting. Let's see it.
 
NAOS said:
Hack has two good bigs who have never won a playoff game between them, a volume-shooting PG who is a traffic cone on defense, and a bench full of un-provens. He shouldn't have made it this far.
Click to expand...

So what you are saying is my team couldn't win a playoff game, that's how bad it is?
 
The only person who has even done anything on CL's team is a very old Duncan, but yet somehow everyone on his team are experienced chanpions.

What a joke.
 
NAOS said:
Hack has two good bigs who have never won a playoff game between them, a volume-shooting PG who is a traffic cone on defense, and a bench full of un-provens. He shouldn't have made it this far.
Click to expand...

Davis is far beyond good, and Irving actually played good defense in the playoffs.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Share this page
Back
Top