**** DuPont

[Deleted member 848]

Examples of positive government actions can fill a library.

how rich is Howard's post, in the context of this thread especially?

 

[RandyForRubio]

Examples of positive government actions can fill a library.

I'm not disagreeing with that, nor have I ever.

 

[Dr. Jones]

Examples of positive government actions can fill a library.

With ****.











I kid. But am still for smaller gment.

 

[RandyForRubio]

how rich is Howard's post, in the context of this thread especially?

Explain. You mean the dirty corporation that bought off the dirty politicians? I don't trust any of em.

 

[Deleted member 848]

With ****.











I kid. But am still for smaller gment.

smaller government is better for business-owners, entrepreneurs, and investors like you-- a man with morals, with care for his employees, and a devotion to caring for many people outside of his family and friends.


Unfortunately, you are in the minority. I really think that's true, Peeks. For every owner like you that has theiir operations streamline and improved with less government, you have ****ing DuPont and Enbridge giving people cancer by the thousands. Your devotion is to God-- others' devotions are to money and power.

 

[Deleted member 848]

Explain. You mean the dirty corporation that bought off the dirty politicians? I don't trust any of em.

read the article. then, tell me how smaller government would have helped those people.

 

[RandyForRubio]

read the article. then, tell me how smaller government would have helped those people.

Bruh, you're missing my point. It doesn't matter what we have, people suck. There's always going to be corruption, that's what I'm saying. Increasing governmental power isn't gonna fix it, but neither will decreasing it.

 

[Saint Cy of JFC]

The environment is ****ed.

 

[franklin]

Dupont bought off officials, smeared scientists, falsified documents, and engaged in a plethora of unethical behavior in order not to be held liable for their actions. Not every criticism of a business is communist blasphemy. People have every right to voice their anger.

Then make it about THAT without the political undertones and agendas with glaring philosophical holes in them. This thread has contained many open attacks at entrepreneurs who are putting in the work that benefits us all. It's dumb and meaningless with that.

FWIW and I doubt it matters but whatever.... I avoid investing in stocks like this out of a matter of principle. I don't believe companies that act in this manner are going to survive long term. Dupont, Monsanto, and Alcoa have been bad *** purchases at times over the last ten years. I don't buy them because investing with criminals is stupid. You can check the old stock thread for both Monsanto and Alcoa if you need some reference. I never put a call on Dupont.

 

[franklin]

smaller government is better for business-owners, entrepreneurs, and investors like you-- a man with morals, with care for his employees, and a devotion to caring for many people outside of his family and friends.


Unfortunately, you are in the minority. I really think that's true, Peeks. For every owner like you that has theiir operations streamline and improved with less government, you have ****ing DuPont and Enbridge giving people cancer by the thousands. Your devotion is to God-- others' devotions are to money and power.

Smaller government also caters to the wants and needs of the local populace. Two sides to every coin, Dala.

 

[Gameface]

smaller government is better for business-owners, entrepreneurs, and investors like you-- a man with morals, with care for his employees, and a devotion to caring for many people outside of his family and friends.


Unfortunately, you are in the minority. I really think that's true, Peeks. For every owner like you that has theiir operations streamline and improved with less government, you have ****ing DuPont and Enbridge giving people cancer by the thousands. Your devotion is to God-- others' devotions are to money and power.

I think an expansion of liability law that made it expedient for individuals to get damages from corporations for harm caused by their industrial endeavors, and a stop to allowing the EPA to grant corporations specific amounts of damage they are allowed to do without any legal recourse would be a fine start.

 

[fishonjazz]

We have teflon pans and always have and recently my wife bought some stainless steel ones. I always do the dishes (My wife cooks) and after she made a couple meals with the stainless steel pans and I attempted to wash them, I told her to never use the stainless steel ones again and that we should get rid of them.

Teflon rules! Stainless steel sucks!