Rule Clarification; Trolling

[Nate505]

Jason/Colton,

Can I get some rule clarification on trolling please? Specifically the bolded part.



This reads to me if you're posting something you don't actually believe just to get reactions of others, it's grounds for mod action.

Is this still the case?

I won't speak for them, but in my personal view if this one were interpreted strictly I'd quit the job due to handing out too many infractions/warnings.

My line is when people repeatedly (in my world that's more than 2 times) harass people. Telling someone off once or twice, fine. What I get irritated by is reading a thread and seeing two morons go back and forth with each other, or even worse, one person just attacking someone else out of the blue repeatedly in a thread. I won't speak for anyone else, but I'm all for voting a fract for it.

 

[NAOS]

Not that anyone cares, but my opinion is that Roach engaged with both frank and NAOS with some unkindness ensuing.
Roach responded with some butt-hurt (when he should have just shrugged it off) while frank and NAOS responded by continually being demeaning and not letting up.

All should treat each other with a bit more respect.
I ONLY ever mess with those I'm comfortable can handle it/like it.
If I sense I'm really truly hurting someone's feelings I stop immediately.

So, in my world, trolling is NOT stopping when you know better.

for the record, my beef with Roach started when he shamelessly **** all over my posts while I was trying to support him. Then, he went on to talk about how I'm as dense as his "daft nurses", and how there are "many doctors that sing his praises." It was hilarious. It was shortly after that when he committed himself to anti-trolling glory... and now, with his existential crisis and total confusion over what a rule is. I'll try to bump the threads if you need to see the record.

 

[Dr. Jones]

for the record, my beef with Roach started when he shameless **** all over my posts while I was trying to support him. Then, he went on to talk about how I'm as dense as his "daft nurses", and how there are "many doctors that sing his praises." It was hilarious. It was shortly after that when he committed himself to glory of anti-trolling... and now, with his existential crisis and total confusion over what a rule is. I'll try to bump the threads if you need to see the record.

I saw them as they were unfolding.
I'm not a mod (thank God), so I don't really care, I was just providing my 2 cents... Which is about 3 cents overpriced.

 

[Jason]

I'd like to see those truly with a hurt butt (had to) use the site's ignore feature but I think that is used less than the dislike function.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

 

[NAOS]

I saw them as they were unfolding.
I'm not a mod (thank God), so I don't really care, I was just providing my 2 cents... Which is about 3 cents overpriced.

glad you were there. It was one of the funniest things on this site in the past year+. For me, at least.

 

[Siro]

for the record, my beef with Roach started when he shamelessly **** all over my posts while I was trying to support him. Then, he went on to talk about how I'm as dense as his "daft nurses", and how there are "many doctors that sing his praises." It was hilarious. It was shortly after that when he committed himself to anti-trolling glory... and now, with his existential crisis and total confusion over what a rule is. I'll try to bump the threads if you need to see the record.

Not "singing his praises", but "speaking his name in reverence". It's probably my favorite quote of all time. So humble.

 

[NAOS]

Not "singing his praises", but "speaking his name in reverence". It's probably my favorite quote of all time. So humble.

I think there were three quotes. I'm glad we now have them all represented in some form.

 

[♪alt13]

Not that anyone cares, but my opinion is that Roach engaged with both frank and NAOS with some unkindness ensuing.
Roach responded with some butt-hurt (when he should have just shrugged it off) while frank and NAOS responded by continually being demeaning and not letting up.

All should treat each other with a bit more respect.
I ONLY ever mess with those I'm comfortable can handle it/like it.
If I sense I'm really truly hurting someone's feelings I stop immediately.

So, in my world, trolling is NOT stopping when you know better.

 

[Dr. Jones]

I only see a small empty box, but in case it was an insult - **** off.

 

[♪alt13]

I only see a small empty box, but in case it was an insult - **** off.

So much for respect

 

[Dr. Jones]

So much for respect

That was a compliment. You are one I perceive able to take it.

 

[fishonjazz]

I'd like to see those truly with a hurt butt (had to) use the site's ignore feature but I think that is used less than the dislike function.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

I think people don't use ignore because you still get notified that the dude you have on ignore quoted you and allot people (myself included obviously) feel the need to defend themselves.