addictionary
Well-Known Member
Last edited:
A contractor that charges the Government for a service or product is not the same. The Government is not a client of PP. Completely opposite comparison.
I remember when I was in my early 20's, my girlfriend at the time, would get her birth control there for free. She came from humble beginnings and I don't think had insurance at the time. From time to time, I would also get contraception there but mostly it was just her getting her birth control. I welcomed the choice/ option then and I welcome it now. The last thing we need is folks having babies who are not prepared to have children.
I support Planned Parenthood and have no issues with them receiving some of my tax dollars.
Furthermore, you'll never find a "faux fiscal conservative" clamoring for cuts in the defense budget. A budget that is full of inflated pricing and inefficiency.
It's a trap!!!Define this please.
That pesky democracy decided that abortion is legal. Take it up with democracy not pph.
Or take it up with the women who want abortions. Women want a legal service that pph provides. Nothing wrong with that. In fact, if not for all the other services provided by pph the abortion number would be much higher
Pretty sure we're a republic, but whatever, I get what your saying. My beef is that I don't care for the abortion paryt of PPH. If it's 3%, then why not just regulate that that service is not covered by medicade, or whatever. There are other places that the women could go to, if they really felt they needed to. I am 100% pro-life and I don't think it's fair that I should have to pay for something that goes against every fiber of my being.
Keep PPH for the good things they do. Cut funding for JUST the abortion part, and I think every talking head will finally shut up.
Fair enoughPretty sure we're a republic, but whatever, I get what your saying. My beef is that I don't care for the abortion paryt of PPH. If it's 3%, then why not just regulate that that service is not covered by medicade, or whatever. There are other places that the women could go to, if they really felt they needed to. I am 100% pro-life and I don't think it's fair that I should have to pay for something that goes against every fiber of my being.
Keep PPH for the good things they do. Cut funding for JUST the abortion part, and I think every talking head will finally shut up.
Pretty sure we're a republic, but whatever, I get what your saying. My beef is that I don't care for the abortion paryt of PPH. If it's 3%, then why not just regulate that that service is not covered by medicade, or whatever. There are other places that the women could go to, if they really felt they needed to. I am 100% pro-life and I don't think it's fair that I should have to pay for something that goes against every fiber of my being.
Keep PPH for the good things they do. Cut funding for JUST the abortion part, and I think every talking head will finally shut up.
Fair enough
But that pesky 3% is stillmurdering children. WTF is wrong with you people?
I didn't mean to press like. So does war but for many it doesn't seem to upsetting.
You're in luck! That's how it is right now.
Not only is this the way it is but this reason ->"I don't think it's fair that I should have to pay for something that goes against every fiber of my being." doesn't work. Taxes pay for all sorts of stuff that people have strong moral convictions against. Military operations are a perfect example.
Not fair enough. That is what is already happening with the funding.
The argument is "we pay Company X this much $$ to perform X, Y and Z. They do those things we are paying them for very well. But they also do V without our funds or time so let's defund them completely!!!"