well since i sent a cordial private message to sirkicky after i noticed it was removed, i guess i expected something back from him instead of a boilerplate death warrant from the mod illuminati
and no haha you're right, the letter of the law was broken. i just find your judgment to be hilarious first in the context of my post, and second in the context of the thread. like four posts before mine you hinted at the importance of including lessons on the background and history of prejudice when it comes to teaching huck finn, because the context of the language of the novel is important in realizing why it's used. yet i link to a relevant video that examines a facet of our interaction WITH THE SAME DISPUTED WORD, but because it uses THE WORD, the video is yanked. then, when i approach a "teacher" to confirm why it was removed, i'm ignored and instead sent to detention, to the same room where people like clutch and hopper, who actively seek to skate the rules and frustrate others, reside. it's just so goddamn perfect, that the sentiment of a relevant, well intentioned post is forgotten because OH GOD HE SAID ******. hahaha, you and kicky couldn't have cooked up a better demonstration of this professor's frustration if you tried
this is to say nothing of the many, MANY horrible ideas that are espoused here daily that are far more offensive than louie ck saying ****, but whatever, i get it now, super draconian, tunnel vision, counterintuitive enforcement etc
but seriously your little bolded rule is really really stupid. like i can't believe you feel good about typing it out, it's really really dumb and insulting and it makes you look really foolish to be so authoritative about it
REP IT UP ****** THIS POST OWNED MOE MUCH LIKE jim was owned in the adventures of huck finn.
Last edited by a moderator: