What's new
By:

Great trade idea

NAOS said:
in what instance were you right? Please provide a specific example and a link.
Click to expand...

Nah. It would be a waste of time. You've already proven to be a troll who is just going to argue anything regardless of how wrong you are.

I'll give you an example and you can go look them up. I pimped going after Harden and Bledsoe more than anyone, and had we done that we'd be a lot better off, and there is absolutely no way you can try and tell me we didn't have enough assets to get them. We had plenty. But I know you. I know how your trolling *** thinks you'll spin that as hard as you can.

I pimped getting rid of Jefferson long before anyone here did also. That was also the right decision.
 
NAOS said:
Lyles is a great project as a third big. If he gets 15% stronger and a reliable 3-pt shot, then he's exactly what we need. And neither of those things are unreasonable to expect. I wasn't thrilled with the pick, but I see the upside. You don't dump that for a guy like Rozier. That's bat****.... pardon me, that's hack**** crazy.
Click to expand...

Did you see the game tonight? Stauskas did some nice things. Even while he was hurt.
 
Hack said:
Nah. It would be a waste of time. You've already proven to be a troll who is just going to argue anything regardless of how wrong you are.

I'll give you an example and you can go look them up. I pimped going after Harden and Bledsoe more than anyone, and had we done that we'd be a lot better off, and there is absolutely no way you can try and tell me we didn't have enough assets to get them. We had plenty. But I know you. I know how your trolling *** thinks you'll spin that as hard as you can.

I pimped getting rid of Jefferson long before anyone here did also. That was also the right decision.
Click to expand...

LOL what kind of **** answer is this?
1. You give no indication of the deals that you proposed, so I'll just toss this whole post into the bin
2. Tons of people were hoping for the same trades, and 100% would have supported depending on the outgoing assets. I was pushing for Bledsoe, too, btw

Hack said:
Did you see the game tonight? Stauskas did some nice things. Even while he was hurt.
Click to expand...

I never have said that Stauskas doesn't have a place in the league. You pimp him too hard, though, that's for sure.
 
NAOS said:
LOL what kind of **** answer is this?
1. You give no indication of the deals that you proposed, so I'll just toss this whole post into the bin
2. Tons of people were hoping for the same trades, and 100% would have supported depending on the outgoing assets. I was pushing for Bledsoe, too, btw



I never have said that Stauskas doesn't have a place in the league. You pimp him too hard, though, that's for sure.
Click to expand...

I have not been pushing Stauskas too hard. It was apparent that he was available last year and for cheap. Hell, they paid to have him shipped off. So I was saying we should go after him. You hated on him hard. You are just back tracking now. Like I knew you would. It's ok. As long as you know deep inside that I'm right.
 
Hack said:
I have not been pushing Stauskas too hard. It was apparent that he was available last year and for cheap. Hell, they paid to have him shipped off. So I was saying we should go after him. You hated on him hard. You are just back tracking now. Like I knew you would. It's ok. As long as you know deep inside that I'm right.
Click to expand...

You have a pathetically selective memory.
 
NAOS said:
You have a pathetically selective memory.
Click to expand...

And you pathetically play both sides of the fence and pathetically and intentionally blurr your opinion.

If I say I like Stauskas and he is worth trading for, and you do **** like lol@ me if I talk about him or any other player. Even though you don't outright say they suck. You are saying they suck if you laugh at me for liking them. That **** is obvious. It doesn't take a genius to figure out what you are trying to say, or what your opinion is. But you pathetically play your stupid games of being vague with what you are saying, You can deny, spin, dance around it all you want. You get no credit for riding the fence. I know what your game is. But you can't win. Because I'm 3 steps ahead. I'm teaching you as we go. You are just gonna have to pull up a chair, and raise your hand when you have a question.
 
Hack said:
And you pathetically play both sides of the fence and pathetically and intentionally blurr your opinion.

If I say I like Stauskas and he is worth trading for, and you do **** like lol@ me if I talk about him or any other player. Even though you don't outright say they suck. You are saying they suck if you laugh at me for liking them. That **** is obvious. It doesn't take a genius to figure out what you are trying to say, or what your opinion is. But you pathetically play your stupid games of being vague with what you are saying, You can deny, spin, dance around it all you want. You get no credit for riding the fence. I know what your game is. But you can't win. Because I'm 3 steps ahead. I'm teaching you as we go. You are just gonna have to pull up a chair, and raise your hand when you have a question.
Click to expand...

I like how your 2 examples of "winning" are two things that never happened.

Also, my position on Stauskas hasn't changed. He could find a spot. #8 was way too high. He can definitely shoot, but his shot-creation skills are questionable at this level. I still feel that way.

Lastly, you suck like a ****ing dumbass mother****ing ****face *** eater
 
NAOS said:
I like how your 2 examples of "winning" are two things that never happened.

Also, my position on Stauskas hasn't changed. He could find a spot. #8 was way too high. He can definitely shoot, but his shot-creation skills are questionable at this level. I still feel that way.

Lastly, you suck like a ****ing dumbass mother****ing ****face *** eater
Click to expand...

Please provide the link to the post that says what you just said there. You've never said one good thing about Stauskas. You've been extremely hating him.

Also, the subject never had anything to do with the 8th overall selection. Our conversations have been well after the draft. We were talking about trading for him. You had no interest in it. None.
 
Hack said:
Please provide the link to the post that says what you just said there. You've never said one good thing about Stauskas. You've been extremely hating him.

Also, the subject never had anything to do with the 8th overall selection. Our conversations have been well after the draft. We were talking about trading for him. You had no interest in it. None.
Click to expand...

I should provide specific links when you won't? No, son, that's not how the world works.
 
Hack said:
Please provide the link to the post that says what you just said there. You've never said one good thing about Stauskas. You've been extremely hating him.

Also, the subject never had anything to do with the 8th overall selection. Our conversations have been well after the draft. We were talking about trading for him. You had no interest in it. None.
Click to expand...

Also, dumbass, I listed the stuff about #8 because I was recapping, as briefly as possible, my thoughts about Stauskas. There was a time when being #8 was relevant. Can you guess when that was??
 
NAOS said:
I should provide specific links when you won't? No, son, that's not how the world works.
Click to expand...
You are the one accusing me of bad memory. So you should have to post links. Plus, I have more credibility than you. Look at our reputation power.
 
NAOS said:
Hacl "won" on two things that never happened, guis. What a ****ing genius.
Click to expand...

Bro. You've been ragging on Stauskas for a year. Quit pretending you like him now because you realized you were wrong. Just stick with your original bet and see what happens.

It's so weak how much you back track so much on the things you say.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Share this page
Back
Top