What's new

Gobert ****ing destroyed some plus on Twitter

If you're implying that it was stupid to get into this with you. I agree.

I'm implying that your major gripe applies as well to you as it does to me. That is, it applies to us both if I accept your terms for engaging with a thread -- which I don't. Anyway, you're losing your own game, which is stupid. Indeed.

I don't like that Rudy did this. Should I have started a different thread to explain why?
 
Should have been your first post.

that might have been possible if I'd understood what Rudy had done. Should I repost my first post again?





Have fun with your campaign on teaching people how to use an internet message board, btw. Reallly important work, but somebody has to do it.
 
that might have been possible if I'd understood what Rudy had done. Should I repost my first post again?





Have fun with your campaign on teaching people how to use an internet message board, btw. Reallly important work, but somebody has to do it.
So once you understood it instead of saying 'oh well that's not cool of Rudy' you go full sarcasm mode and and subtlety try to say that everyone who finds it funny it an *******.

Btw, you still haven't even said why you think it's uncool. (Which is apparently the whole point) in your many posts in this thread. And when I answered your all important question you completely ignored it.
 
So once you understood it instead of saying 'oh well that's not cool of Rudy' you go full sarcasm mode and and subtlety try to say that everyone who finds it funny it an *******.

Btw, you still haven't even said why you think it's uncool. (Which is apparently the whole point) in your many posts in this thread. And when I answered your all important question you completely ignored it.

my feelings are pretty strongly implied. You seem to be fine picking up on other implications; why not these ones?

more questions for you: are you really standing against sarcasm right now? Do you think I should have started a second thread about Rudy's behavior and put my sarcasmless posts in it?
 
my feelings are pretty strongly implied. You seem to be fine picking up on other implications; why not these ones?

more questions for you: are you really standing against sarcasm right now? Do you think I should have started a second thread about Rudy's behavior and put my sarcasmless posts in it?
I'm just saying that if you wanted to argue about whether or not it's cool to make fun of fat kids who get embarrassed by adults on Twitter, then you went about it poorly.
 
I'm just saying that if you wanted to argue about whether or not it's cool to make fun of fat kids who get embarrassed by adults on Twitter, then you went about it poorly.

last questions:

do you understand that I don't give a **** about how you think I should or shouldn't write posts on jazzfanz? Are you uncomfortable with how often you've been guilty of the exact same thing you're accusing me of doing? Do you feel like a board-wide education campaign on how to post is going to be worthwhile? or is this just one of a few miserable attempts to do so?
 
last questions:

do you understand that I don't give a **** about how you think I should or shouldn't write posts on jazzfanz? Are you uncomfortable with how often you've been guilty of the exact same thing you're accusing me of doing? Do you feel like a board-wide education campaign on how to post is going to be worthwhile? or is this just one of a few miserable attempts to do so?
It's your right to post however the **** you see fit. And it's my right to respond however the **** I see fit.

Speaking of doing the exact same thing you are accusing me of. Lol

Are you saying I can't respond to your posts however the hell I want?


Edit: dat grammar.
 
Have you been to France??? Easily the meanest people I've met.

Have been to France. I didn't think they were so mean as they did not suffer American foolishness. Can't say I blame them.

11787992_f520.jpg
 
Back
Top