What's new
By:

Gobert ****ing destroyed some plus on Twitter

NAOS said:
my tea just came back up through my nose, bro.
Click to expand...

NAOS said:
I totally agree with this statement now that I've been educated. Can we sticky this thread?
Click to expand...

NAOS said:
keeps bumping the thread? wtf are you talking about? Did I find this thread in the dust bin three pages back?

So, let me get this straight... I should be liking this because Rudy apparently humiliated a kid on twitter?
Click to expand...

NAOS said:
ok. I understand your position on the twitter event.

Can you now explain your feelings about my behavior in this thread? You seem flustered.
Click to expand...

NAOS said:
Is that why I came into this thread? Or did I ask for some background first so that I could understand? There are fewer than 40 posts; you can easily do the research.


Ok, I really want to get into this with you guys...

How old do you think this kid is? How long are we hoping he feels humiliated? tia
Click to expand...

NAOS said:
neither is your cherry-picking function
Click to expand...

Wat? You asked for evidence that you weren't just ****posting for the sake of ****posting.

You obviously don't think it's funny (which is fine obvi) but instead of leaving it at that you want to be better than everyone who does find it funny. You're awesome bro.

****posting for the sake of ****posting.

But you managed to waste some of my time. So good job I guess.
 
Bawse Dawg said:
Wat? You asked for evidence that you weren't just ****posting for the sake of ****posting.

You obviously don't think it's funny (which is fine obvi) but instead of leaving it at that you want to be better than everyone who does find it funny. You're awesome bro.

****posting for the sake of ****posting.

But you managed to waste some of my time. So good job I guess.
Click to expand...

Why can't he post even though he doesn't find it funny? You're getting too worked up over this.
 
Bawse Dawg said:
Wat? You asked for evidence that you weren't just ****posting for the sake of ****posting.

You obviously don't think it's funny (which is fine obvi) but instead of leaving it at that you want to be better than everyone who does find it funny. You're awesome bro.

****posting for the sake of ****posting.

But you managed to waste some of my time. So good job I guess.
Click to expand...

why'd you miss my first post?

NAOS said:
if you feel like sharing, I'd read your post. I have no idea what this is about.
Click to expand...

Also, answer my question bro: how long do you hope this kid feel humiliated?

After I get that answer, maybe I'll follow up with questions about when and how adults should humiliate kids for their own entertainment.
 
NAOS said:
why'd you miss my first post?



Also, answer my question bro: how long do you hope this kid feel humiliated?

After I get that answer, maybe I'll follow up with questions about when and how adults should humiliate kids for their own entertainment.
Click to expand...
Exactly, that's what you've been waiting for. Instead of taking it for what it is. Getting a nice chuckle (or not) and leaving it at that. You wanna give us a lecture on what ****ty people we are. I can't wait.

To answer your question, it's not a matter of time. If he is humiliated enough that he learned his lesson, that's good. One less troll on Twitter. If parents want to teach their kids that actions have consequences, I don't see that as a bad thing.
 
Bawse Dawg said:
If you're implying that it was stupid to get into this with you. I agree.
Click to expand...

I'm implying that your major gripe applies as well to you as it does to me. That is, it applies to us both if I accept your terms for engaging with a thread -- which I don't. Anyway, you're losing your own game, which is stupid. Indeed.

I don't like that Rudy did this. Should I have started a different thread to explain why?
 
Bawse Dawg said:
Should have been your first post.
Click to expand...

that might have been possible if I'd understood what Rudy had done. Should I repost my first post again?





Have fun with your campaign on teaching people how to use an internet message board, btw. Reallly important work, but somebody has to do it.
 
NAOS said:
that might have been possible if I'd understood what Rudy had done. Should I repost my first post again?





Have fun with your campaign on teaching people how to use an internet message board, btw. Reallly important work, but somebody has to do it.
Click to expand...
So once you understood it instead of saying 'oh well that's not cool of Rudy' you go full sarcasm mode and and subtlety try to say that everyone who finds it funny it an *******.

Btw, you still haven't even said why you think it's uncool. (Which is apparently the whole point) in your many posts in this thread. And when I answered your all important question you completely ignored it.
 
Bawse Dawg said:
So once you understood it instead of saying 'oh well that's not cool of Rudy' you go full sarcasm mode and and subtlety try to say that everyone who finds it funny it an *******.

Btw, you still haven't even said why you think it's uncool. (Which is apparently the whole point) in your many posts in this thread. And when I answered your all important question you completely ignored it.
Click to expand...

my feelings are pretty strongly implied. You seem to be fine picking up on other implications; why not these ones?

more questions for you: are you really standing against sarcasm right now? Do you think I should have started a second thread about Rudy's behavior and put my sarcasmless posts in it?
 
NAOS said:
my feelings are pretty strongly implied. You seem to be fine picking up on other implications; why not these ones?

more questions for you: are you really standing against sarcasm right now? Do you think I should have started a second thread about Rudy's behavior and put my sarcasmless posts in it?
Click to expand...
I'm just saying that if you wanted to argue about whether or not it's cool to make fun of fat kids who get embarrassed by adults on Twitter, then you went about it poorly.
 
Bawse Dawg said:
I'm just saying that if you wanted to argue about whether or not it's cool to make fun of fat kids who get embarrassed by adults on Twitter, then you went about it poorly.
Click to expand...

last questions:

do you understand that I don't give a **** about how you think I should or shouldn't write posts on jazzfanz? Are you uncomfortable with how often you've been guilty of the exact same thing you're accusing me of doing? Do you feel like a board-wide education campaign on how to post is going to be worthwhile? or is this just one of a few miserable attempts to do so?
 
NAOS said:
last questions:

do you understand that I don't give a **** about how you think I should or shouldn't write posts on jazzfanz? Are you uncomfortable with how often you've been guilty of the exact same thing you're accusing me of doing? Do you feel like a board-wide education campaign on how to post is going to be worthwhile? or is this just one of a few miserable attempts to do so?
Click to expand...
It's your right to post however the **** you see fit. And it's my right to respond however the **** I see fit.

Speaking of doing the exact same thing you are accusing me of. Lol

Are you saying I can't respond to your posts however the hell I want?


Edit: dat grammar.
 
Siro said:
Have you been to France??? Easily the meanest people I've met.
Click to expand...

Have been to France. I didn't think they were so mean as they did not suffer American foolishness. Can't say I blame them.

11787992_f520.jpg
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Share this page
Back
Top