What's new
By:

Would trading for Teague be skipping steps?

Skipping steps?

  • No, this is exactly what we need.

    Votes: 11 34.4%

  • Yes, Gotta keep the cake baking.

    Votes: 1 3.1%

  • Yes, if we gave to much up.

    Votes: 15 46.9%

  • No, we need to use these assets.

    Votes: 5 15.6%
  • Total voters
    32
*shrug, maybe you're right, but they are still in danger of losing Bazemore for nothing. Some combo of Booker and Jazz picks might be the best they get offered.
 
King Cy said:
He writes for CBS, so I thin he is above "amateur" status.
Click to expand...

What did you think of the proposed trades in the article?

(I'm not really interested in the shift in conversation you've taken, since I don't care if we agree on the definition of amateur or the quality of CBS Sports' online content.)
 
Willie G. said:
I have no idea. I'm still catching up to the new calculus that came along with this cap explosion. Anyway, the point is that they're not trading him.
Click to expand...

Whatever you think is too much... add $5M to it... he will get overpaid. The FA pool is small, especially at that position, and almost every team has $$$$.

This is the reason I would retain Burks. He plays a position of need and if he can get healthy his value goes up... then all these teams that miss out on FA targets and see the dollars out there and Burks looks like a steal.
 
Matt Moore is decent... the trades were not great. they weren't Bill Simmons bad though.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Share this page
Back
Top