Joe Bagadonuts
Well-Known Member
Maybe a better way to say it is that I don't feel the immense responsibility you apparently do for all of these perceived crimes of man against women. It feels like you are implying that being a man is a crime. It seems like you believe that women suffer constant and ongoing harm because of the existence of men. I don't think that's true, even though there are obviously specific occasions where it does happen.Interesting. I'd not call it being overly sensitive to acknowledge the reality of sexual harrasment that many women face, and simultaneously, suggesting that men, who don't face the same reality, may have a hard time empathizing with it.
When I read your post, and that of others on this thread, I think "Holy ****, thank God I'm not that callous."
I'm reasonably certain, moreover, that were this become your reality too in some way, either against you or a woman/girl you love, you'd discover that you're a whole lot more sensitive about this than you thought you were.
I feel like its my responsibility to treat the women I come in contact with respectfully, and I also want to defend the women I care about. Events like the Andrews situation matter to me and I am glad the perpetrator is in jail, but I believe that spreading the net to include the hotel chain is going way too far. To me it would have been reasonable to fine them $500,000 because of negligence, inform them how this perpetrator used their own systems to locate his target, and tell them if that situation isn't rectified within 6 months that they would be facing a $55 million dollar fine. I think they would probably get things fixed quickly under that scenario.