What's new

Ok who should start?

Who should start for the new-look Jazz?


  • Total voters
    56
Actually I was thinking about this as the official new starting lineup thread so the same starting lineups don't have to be posted over and over in every thread about Hayward, Favors, AJ, Sap, CJ, et al. Here is the forum to discuss what starting lineup you would like to see and why.

In the end we all know that this won't make a monkey **** of a difference to the outcome of this season. Come on just play along guy.

I know. That's why I am playing along. These line ups are too strong. I need some excitement and development, but not many wins. So here are my guys:

1 Harris, 2/3 Favors, 2/3 Evans, 4 AJ, 5 Fes.

Hayward to the gym or D-League. Bell, CJ, and Price to Bahamas. Pull up any and every 2 no matter how long of a shot he is and hope to find a lucky diamond.
 
Favors will be in the starting lineup in the future, but not yet.

PG Harris
SG Hayward
SF Kirilenko
PF Millsap
C Al Jefferson
 
My choices were:

Harris
Hayward
AK
Favors
AJ


I know some might have thought about Evans but I am liking him better off the bench as an energy guy. This gives us a bench of:

Watson
Bell
CJ/Evans
Sap
Fess/Elson

Not a bad bench really.

This is the rotations I like as well. I voted for these same players.
 
So it appears the JazzFanz starting lineup is as follows:

Harris (unanimous - 38 of 38 votes)
Hayward (33 of 38 votes)
AK (35 of 38 votes)
Millsap (22 vs 15 over Favors, the closest margin)
AJ (unanimous - 38 of 38 votes)
 
I'm fine with the current starting lineup. I am in agreement that Bell shouldn't be given tons of minutes. He hasn't produced, but as a starter getting 20 minutes, I'm fine with.
 
Not to troll Log, but how the **** does this poll make any sense at all? Shouldnt you have put possible lineups as poll selections? Just sayin.
 
Not to troll Log, but how the **** does this poll make any sense at all? Shouldnt you have put possible lineups as poll selections? Just sayin.

Makes sense to me. You get 5 votes so you vote for the 5 guys you think should be the starters. The top 5 players are the 5 guys that the fans here want to start.

What is so hard to understand?
 
Makes sense to me. You get 5 votes so you vote for the 5 guys you think should be the starters. The top 5 players are the 5 guys that the fans here want to start.

What is so hard to understand?

This.

I thought about putting up different lineups but I thought that would kind of defeat the purpose of seeing who wants which players to start. Plus I might have hit lineups that people kind of wanted but maybe not one or 2 players. This way we can see who the group thinks should start one player at a time.

For example I find it interesting that one person wants Watson to start. The interesting part would be to get people to talk about who they traded off. Did that person want Watson to start over Harris? Or as the 2-guard? I just think it is interesting.

Also if we took the lowest totals we would have this starting lineup:

Watson
Bell
Miles
Favors
Fess

Ugh.
 
Back
Top