What's new
By:

A win for the Central Bank and it's puppet Obama

Jamezz

Jamezz

Well-Known Member
So here me out, almost 100 years later (since 1928) they decide to remove Andrew Jackson's face from the $20 bill and replace it with Aunt Jemima's. Jokes aside I'm sure that Harriet Tubman's influence in the abolitionist movement was remarkable but come on, taking out Andrew Jackson? One of the most influential Founding Fathers of this country, one of the few presidents who had the "cojones" to stand up against the British royal family run Central Bank? Suck a duck Obama, you puppet for Your Travesty the B of England.

Link: https://nypost.com/2016/04/20/harriet-tubman-will-replace-andrew-jackson-on-the-20-bill/

The abomination:

tubman%2020%20bill.jpg



"Of course we will comply Your Majesty"

queen-obama-2_1903730b.jpg



AMERICAN HERO:

AndrewJackson1834WEB.jpg
 
Last edited:
If you are going to present what is happening to the money you should be thorough.

Tubman is going on the front of the 20, Jackson is being moved to the back of the 20 (he's not even off the 20 entirely) along side the White House.

Further more the back of the $10 bill is changing from the Treasury building to an image of a women's suffrage march that ended at said building. 5 prominent women members of that movement will be displayed along side the image. (Lucretia Mott, Sojourner Truth, Elizabeth Cady Stanton, Alice Paul and Susan B Anthony).

The back of the $5 is also changing. The Lincoln Memorial will now be the back drop for the 1939 performance of Marian Anderson.

I have no problem with these changes tbh. I don't think our money and its look was a problem but the change doesn't bother me. The only thing I'd have done differents is that back of the $20, 10 or 5 would be changed to a historical American moment. Moon landing, D-Day, Pearl Harbor, Louisiana purchase...something. I'd probably change the back of the $1 with that.

https://www.nytimes.com/2016/04/21/us/women-currency-treasury-harriet-tubman.html
 
Even being thorough I find it a stupid initiative, as if there aren't any other more important issues at hand...
 
Jamezz said:
Even being thorough I find it a stupid initiative, as if there aren't any other more important issues at hand...
Click to expand...

Fair enough but your initial post gives it far harsher treatment than simply being "stupid".
 
Stoked said:
Fair enough but your initial post gives it far harsher treatment than simply being "stupid".
Click to expand...

It's kinda like facebook. You know, when someone you don't like does the smallest perceived thing "wrong", you post all about it from your favorite biased news source. If you see a shot, you jump on it.

Jboogie here, as a biggoted racialist, saw a shot and took it. Don't act surprised.
 
You realize the treasury changes the money like every 10 years to curb counterfeiting?
 
ElRoach0 said:
It's kinda like facebook. You know, when someone you don't like does the smallest perceived thing "wrong", you post all about it from your favorite biased news source. If you see a shot, you jump on it.

Jboogie here, as a biggoted racialist, saw a shot and took it. Don't act surprised.
Click to expand...

Please expand on your accusation.
 
^ No I don't plan on doing that a-hole. You can't just throw accusations like that based on nothing.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Share this page
Back
Top