I was always concerned about Millsap's size. When he left I was saying that we needed him to accept a bench role and that if he could do that the Jazz would be great. Obviously he's more than a bench player, but if he had accepted that role here, well, the Jazz would have been great.As I'm watching the Hawks/Celtics game (Millsap currently has 45 points), did the Jazz make a mistake in letting him walk? Hindsight is 20/20, but can you imagine Millsap next to Gobert? Would've been fun to see...
I was always concerned about Millsap's size. When he left I was saying that we needed him to accept a bench role and that if he could do that the Jazz would be great. Obviously he's more than a bench player, but if he had accepted that role here, well, the Jazz would have been great.
It won't be exactly the same. If that answers your question.Will this Millsap thread be any different from the other two dozen since he left?
I was always concerned about Millsap's size. When he left I was saying that we needed him to accept a bench role and that if he could do that the Jazz would be great. Obviously he's more than a bench player, but if he had accepted that role here, well, the Jazz would have been great.
Absolutely ****ing incredible.I was always concerned about Millsap's size. When he left I was saying that we needed him to accept a bench role and that if he could do that the Jazz would be great. Obviously he's more than a bench player, but if he had accepted that role here, well, the Jazz would have been great.
As I'm watching the Hawks/Celtics game (Millsap currently has 45 points), did the Jazz make a mistake in letting him walk? Hindsight is 20/20, but can you imagine Millsap next to Gobert? Would've been fun to see...
Absolutely ****ing incredible.
Everyone is aware that Millsap in year five and beyond is better than Favors has ever been (and he just finished year 6), right? Apparently not.
But sure, you're not technically wrong. Ginobili has been better than the player he subs in for as well.